That sort of talk will land you in Guantanamo 'un'-secret prison.
i dare some motherfucker to try and take me to cuba. so many contingents are in place that the stink would reach high heaven before i even knew what was going on.
That sort of talk will land you in Guantanamo 'un'-secret prison.
I think the Taliban are dipshits. Pursue them all you want, but not at the expense of civilians. If there were terrorists hiding in the US would NATO bomb the cities?
So we should let them use this tactic without any retaliation whatsoever?
Why oh why cant they strangle the House of Saud, which is the real problem behind all of this.
I denounce all terrorists who use innocent civilians esp children as human shields/targets.
Now I want to know. Do you?
i figured out why sam rags on the US so much.
read 'em and weep sam.
india is The "largest democracy in the world" and it does not have a clean human rights record. Every year, thousands of people are imprisoned for political reasons, often without charges of trials. Torture and ill-treatment are common, and hundreds have died in custody. Hundreds more are victims of extra-judicial executions or forced "disappearances". Armed groups commit grave human rights violations, including killings, tortures and rapes, with impunity.
The Hindu nationalist policies espoused by India's governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its affiliate organizations undermined the country's historical commitment to secular democracy. Violence against Christian, Muslim, and Dalit, or "untouchable," populations was one result. Areas of separatist violence such as Kashmir and northeast India were marked by grave human rights abuses on the part of Indian security forces and armed rebel groups. Violence against women continued, from infanticide to dowry-related deaths to attacks on women whose male relatives were sought by the police. A major campaign on Dalit rights gathered strength, but some human rights defenders were targets of a state-sponsored backlash against their activism.
WASHINGTON, FEB. 25. The United States has maintained that while the Government of India "generally respected" the human rights of its citizens, "numerous serious problems remained" and has listed several "significant human rights abuses" to include extra judicial killings, faked encounters, custodial deaths and torture and rape by the police and other government agents.
At least hundreds of thousands, and probably more than a million women and children are employed in Indian brothels. Many are victims of the increasingly widespread practice of trafficking in persons across international borders. In India, a large percentage of the victims are women and girls from Nepal. This report focuses on the trafficking of girls and women from Nepal to brothels in Bombay, where nongovernmental organizations say they comprise up to half of the city's estimated 100,000 brothel workers. Twenty percent of Bombay's brothel population is thought to be girls under the age of eighteen, and half of that population may be infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
all of the above was from the first half of the first page of my search results.
your country fucking sucks when it comes to human rights abuses within its border.
If the civilian population is helping the Taliban: Yes.
If not: No.
Moreover, you'll have to find me some references for a -purposeful- strike on civvie targets in Afghanistan. Last I checked, the US goes out of her way to buy precision munitions so she doesn't have to carpet bomb cities.
So how do you decide which ones you've killed are helping the Taliban, and which ones you killed were not?Nickelodeon:
If the civilian population is helping the Taliban: Yes.
No one cares about dying Afghan civilians
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=40&ItemID=11746
They are making them rich???
apparently, not even the afghans themselves.
You mean the "militants" who are fighting back?
samcdkey and you don't care about the civilians ether, you only use them for a excuse to rag on the U.S., the Taliban doesn't care about civilian death, that has been shown by the way they attack civilian targets with indiscriminate bombings, and the use of them as shields, I would really like to be able to see one of the supposed wedding parties that we are supposed to have attacked with out cause, I really believe that if seem up close you would find that they weren't really wedding parties, and that Terrorist were having a sit-down to make plans to attack more innocent civilians.
Since the Nato airstrikes began on March 24 Serb officials say more than 2,000 civilians have been killed and more than 7,500 wounded. Nato has owned up to bombing raids and missile attacks that have killed 460 civilians, according to a tally by Agence France-Presse. By all accounts, the bombing was indiscriminate, killing farmers, suburbanites, city dwellers, factory workers, reporters, diplomats, people in cars, busses and trains, hospital patients, the elderly and children. Indeed, by our count, Nato bombing raids have killed more than 200 children.
i mean those who are using them as human shields.