Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab
- Thread starter Paul W. Dixon
- Start date
Will Sheephogan
Registered Member
This data costs squat to archive..guys, 
I have received a letter back from fermilab. There are special circumstances in relation to this subject that they have been concerned about involving certain undetermined thresholds. Additional information will be provided soon in a public release. No testing is presently scheduled for now or in the future that would violate these thresholds.
I have received a letter back from fermilab. There are special circumstances in relation to this subject that they have been concerned about involving certain undetermined thresholds. Additional information will be provided soon in a public release. No testing is presently scheduled for now or in the future that would violate these thresholds.
Good morning all. I've been following this thread off and on for a while now, long before I ever registered with SciForums. I'd just like to ask one favor: if you're about to destroy the Universe with this experiment, can ya let me know ahead of time please? This way I'll have time to transport to an alternate Universe. Thanks much.
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
Especial thanks to Rev. W. Sheaphogan for obtaining the statement concerning the threshold towards de Sitter space which is of concern in this connection. As is indicated in the article by Malcom J. Perry, Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe? (reference given several times in this thread) the potential barrier toward de Sitter space is large but not infinite. Alas, Fermlab has again increased the energies yet higher to a luminosity of 67.80E30 at some 2 TeV. Since the level of the threshold value to deSitter space is unknown, let us notify all possible media to let them know of these most salient concerns. We must call for a moratorium on all further research until the values of these thresholds have been established. Then and only then can this research proceed.
Please recall that this is a new record at Fermilab. We are thus witnessing the greatest energies yet seen on earth. Since we are exploring energy values which approximate those found at the point origin of the Universe, it is possible to imagine that the laboratory mischance would be very lare indeed, i.e., a Type Ia Supernova destroying our planet, the solar system and a host of near-by stars.
All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf!!! May the good God have mercy on our souls.
Many, many thanks!!!
All Best Wishes,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Especial thanks to Rev. W. Sheaphogan for obtaining the statement concerning the threshold towards de Sitter space which is of concern in this connection. As is indicated in the article by Malcom J. Perry, Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe? (reference given several times in this thread) the potential barrier toward de Sitter space is large but not infinite. Alas, Fermlab has again increased the energies yet higher to a luminosity of 67.80E30 at some 2 TeV. Since the level of the threshold value to deSitter space is unknown, let us notify all possible media to let them know of these most salient concerns. We must call for a moratorium on all further research until the values of these thresholds have been established. Then and only then can this research proceed.
Please recall that this is a new record at Fermilab. We are thus witnessing the greatest energies yet seen on earth. Since we are exploring energy values which approximate those found at the point origin of the Universe, it is possible to imagine that the laboratory mischance would be very lare indeed, i.e., a Type Ia Supernova destroying our planet, the solar system and a host of near-by stars.
All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf!!! May the good God have mercy on our souls.
Many, many thanks!!!
All Best Wishes,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Last edited:
ah ha! I've been trying to figure out why I think this thread should go. I mean, there are tons of pointless arguments and outrageous statements made at sci-forums on an hourly basis so what bugs me about this particular thread? Then it occurred to me what it is, this isn't a discussion, this thread is essentially spam. Perhaps not in a commercial sense but it's intellectual spam. The primary poster just broadcasts the same idea over and over but ignores the discussion, theres no back-and-forth.
I think there are very few justifiable reasons to close a thread but spam is certainly one of them.
I think there are very few justifiable reasons to close a thread but spam is certainly one of them.
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
All thanks to you everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
Most generally, the ongoing research effort is a continued effort to explore the parameters of the Standard Model in subatomic physics. Thus the pursuit of supersymmetry and the Higgs particle are the chalice(s) of immortalty for these dedicated workers. The unfortunate aspect of the inadvertent formation of a transitition towards de Sitter space, which is then formative of a Type Ia Supernova, would only be counted as a laboratory mischance and hence of only minor significance. Experimentally, this would be considered as an experimental side-effect. We might consider this an an Experimentum Secundus, an experiment of the second type where the only difference from an experiment of the first type is that there are none to observe the results of the experiment. The experiment underway that gave rise to the disaster at Chernobyl was a fine example of an Experimentum Secundus! Please provide our thread with other exemplars of this novel genera.
All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
ALL BEST WISHES,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
All thanks to you everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
Most generally, the ongoing research effort is a continued effort to explore the parameters of the Standard Model in subatomic physics. Thus the pursuit of supersymmetry and the Higgs particle are the chalice(s) of immortalty for these dedicated workers. The unfortunate aspect of the inadvertent formation of a transitition towards de Sitter space, which is then formative of a Type Ia Supernova, would only be counted as a laboratory mischance and hence of only minor significance. Experimentally, this would be considered as an experimental side-effect. We might consider this an an Experimentum Secundus, an experiment of the second type where the only difference from an experiment of the first type is that there are none to observe the results of the experiment. The experiment underway that gave rise to the disaster at Chernobyl was a fine example of an Experimentum Secundus! Please provide our thread with other exemplars of this novel genera.
All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
ALL BEST WISHES,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Last edited:
Good point buffys. If this guy had been saying 'convert to my religion' or 'isreal is bad' and didn't offer any actual replies, he would have been banned by now.
I think his Ph.D. in General Experimental Psychology is the cause for this thread. I also think it disingenuous for him to point out that he is a Ph.D. in a thread which has nothing to do with his experience.
http://www.uhh.hawaii.edu/~dixon/PaulDixonCV.html
I also find it funny that both him and MacM are in "Who's Who". I pray I never end up in that book.
His CV also says "Nominated for Nobel Prize in Physics, 1986, 1995, 1998". First this is funny because it is not verifiable at all. It's even worse because "According to the Statutes of the Nobel Foundation, information about the nominations is not to be disclosed, publicly or privately, for a period of fifty years." Even funny because all you ned to get nominated is to know a professor at one of the universties which can give nominations.
A further look at his CV shows no experience in this field, and very little serious academic work in the last 20 years. His posts are just as uninformed as those that say 'join my religion because it is good' and 'isreal sucks because it is bad'. Even further, this is a theory that can't even ever be tested. Dixon keeps claiming eminent demise, regardless of what they are doing.
I think his Ph.D. in General Experimental Psychology is the cause for this thread. I also think it disingenuous for him to point out that he is a Ph.D. in a thread which has nothing to do with his experience.
http://www.uhh.hawaii.edu/~dixon/PaulDixonCV.html
I also find it funny that both him and MacM are in "Who's Who". I pray I never end up in that book.
His CV also says "Nominated for Nobel Prize in Physics, 1986, 1995, 1998". First this is funny because it is not verifiable at all. It's even worse because "According to the Statutes of the Nobel Foundation, information about the nominations is not to be disclosed, publicly or privately, for a period of fifty years." Even funny because all you ned to get nominated is to know a professor at one of the universties which can give nominations.
A further look at his CV shows no experience in this field, and very little serious academic work in the last 20 years. His posts are just as uninformed as those that say 'join my religion because it is good' and 'isreal sucks because it is bad'. Even further, this is a theory that can't even ever be tested. Dixon keeps claiming eminent demise, regardless of what they are doing.
Just a little deeper thought for Paul. How about this Paul. Lets say the experiment does supernova. How can you tell if it has or hasn't? This could be an alternate time line from when the experiment has already destroyed the whole galaxy (and perhaps some of the closer ones). Perhaps in this line the experiments are successful. Its hard to predict what is going to happen if you first have no understanding of the event. It like your going to a ball game....but what kind of ball game? and where is it held?ValleyBall?BasketBall?
Football?Foosball?Or maybe its a completely new and different game unknown to you so what do you do before you go? You find out about it. Just because you've got a doctorate in psychology and a hobby in physics doesn't mean your Albert Einstien. I doubt Albert would know what would happen if you delt with that kind of experiment. Theorys must be test....otherwise we will never know.
Football?Foosball?Or maybe its a completely new and different game unknown to you so what do you do before you go? You find out about it. Just because you've got a doctorate in psychology and a hobby in physics doesn't mean your Albert Einstien. I doubt Albert would know what would happen if you delt with that kind of experiment. Theorys must be test....otherwise we will never know.
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
Many thanks to everyone for your prompts actions in this most tragic concern.
The luminosity in the CDF at Fermilab is now some 65.77E30 at some 2TeV. This is some 6 orders of magnitude above those values found at the beginning of Run II at Fermilab. Where these energies already are essentially those found at the point origin of the universe, the likelihood of forming a transition towards de Sitter space approaches 1, which is absolute certainty, with this steady increase in energies as we plunge recklessly to our doom. Francis Bacon, Baron Verulam, Viscount St. Albans (1521 - 1626), was one of the first to advocate the accumulation of fact and observation as the source of truth rather than basing everything on deductive logic and authority. High-energy physics is an empirical science and this is why experiments are carried out at Fermilab. Should there be an oversight in their equations, then the generation of Type Ia Supernova will result thus destroying the earth, the solar system and a host of nearby stars!
Very often in science it is found that someone from another field provides for a new and important discovery in science. Coming from another field, provides for greater freedom of perception than for someone who is schooled in a narrow methodolgy that limits perceptual freedom.
All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
ALL BEST WISHES
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Many thanks to everyone for your prompts actions in this most tragic concern.
The luminosity in the CDF at Fermilab is now some 65.77E30 at some 2TeV. This is some 6 orders of magnitude above those values found at the beginning of Run II at Fermilab. Where these energies already are essentially those found at the point origin of the universe, the likelihood of forming a transition towards de Sitter space approaches 1, which is absolute certainty, with this steady increase in energies as we plunge recklessly to our doom. Francis Bacon, Baron Verulam, Viscount St. Albans (1521 - 1626), was one of the first to advocate the accumulation of fact and observation as the source of truth rather than basing everything on deductive logic and authority. High-energy physics is an empirical science and this is why experiments are carried out at Fermilab. Should there be an oversight in their equations, then the generation of Type Ia Supernova will result thus destroying the earth, the solar system and a host of nearby stars!
Very often in science it is found that someone from another field provides for a new and important discovery in science. Coming from another field, provides for greater freedom of perception than for someone who is schooled in a narrow methodolgy that limits perceptual freedom.
All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
ALL BEST WISHES
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Last edited:
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB
All thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most most tragic concern.
From an autobiographical perspective, it is also significant to remark on the doctoral program which which was provided. This program had very little to do with Psychology and mostly focused on Physics and Multivariate Statistics. There is a degree whose content is psychological and this the Psy. D..
Also the test scores which were obtianed on entrance into college showed a 99 + % Natural Sciences, 99 + % in Humanities and 99 % in Socical Sciences. My strong areas are, therefore, from a lifetime perspective, highest in the Natural Sciences which includes Physics and Mathematics, next highest in the Humanities with knowledge in Literature and Music and last but not least the Social Sciences.
The hypothesis for this thread combines the Social Sciences and the Natural Sciences so that even though the very great energies resident in de Sitter space are very well-known in the scientific community, variables such as socio-economic status and the desire to pursue research goals take precedence over survival not only for the individual but for the entire species. These were the reasons advanced by the scientists at Fermilab when they were queried as to how they could continue with their research even though a laboratory mischance would destroy everyone with a Type Ia Supernova.
All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
ALL GOOD WISHES
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
All thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most most tragic concern.
From an autobiographical perspective, it is also significant to remark on the doctoral program which which was provided. This program had very little to do with Psychology and mostly focused on Physics and Multivariate Statistics. There is a degree whose content is psychological and this the Psy. D..
Also the test scores which were obtianed on entrance into college showed a 99 + % Natural Sciences, 99 + % in Humanities and 99 % in Socical Sciences. My strong areas are, therefore, from a lifetime perspective, highest in the Natural Sciences which includes Physics and Mathematics, next highest in the Humanities with knowledge in Literature and Music and last but not least the Social Sciences.
The hypothesis for this thread combines the Social Sciences and the Natural Sciences so that even though the very great energies resident in de Sitter space are very well-known in the scientific community, variables such as socio-economic status and the desire to pursue research goals take precedence over survival not only for the individual but for the entire species. These were the reasons advanced by the scientists at Fermilab when they were queried as to how they could continue with their research even though a laboratory mischance would destroy everyone with a Type Ia Supernova.
All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls!
ALL GOOD WISHES
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
My god, did Dixon just address a post? Wow!
Also the test scores which were obtianed on entrance into college showed a 99 + % Natural Sciences, 99 + % in Humanities and 99 % in Socical Sciences. My strong areas are, therefore, from a lifetime perspective, highest in the Natural Sciences which includes Physics and Mathematics, next highest in the Humanities with knowledge in Literature and Music and last but not least the Social Sciences.
He must be right then... lol
Also the test scores which were obtianed on entrance into college showed a 99 + % Natural Sciences, 99 + % in Humanities and 99 % in Socical Sciences. My strong areas are, therefore, from a lifetime perspective, highest in the Natural Sciences which includes Physics and Mathematics, next highest in the Humanities with knowledge in Literature and Music and last but not least the Social Sciences.
He must be right then... lol
Paul W. Dixon
Registered Senior Member
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERRMILAB
Many thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
Please take a monment to review the article by Malcom Perry entitled, Quantum tunelling towards an exploding Universe? We may note "... de Sitter space, a maximally symmetric space-time, whose spatial extent is exponentially expanding on a tiimescale tau. Classically, a transition from one type of solution to another is forbidden by a large potential barrier." (Theoretical Physics, Nature, 1986, Vol 320, p. 679) The very large energy values for de Sitter space are given midway through the first page of this thread. To access these vast energies by breaching the potential barrier towards de Sitter space, a breaching which is then only a function of energy in the classical picture, may easily be accomplished with those energies that are now employed at Fermilab that are essentially equal to those found at the point origin of our Universe. i.e., the Big Bang. Such a breaching, must then be generative of a Type Ia Supernova.
All the children will thank you for your prompt efforts on their behalf, and may the good God have mercy on our souls.
All Good Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
Many thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.
Please take a monment to review the article by Malcom Perry entitled, Quantum tunelling towards an exploding Universe? We may note "... de Sitter space, a maximally symmetric space-time, whose spatial extent is exponentially expanding on a tiimescale tau. Classically, a transition from one type of solution to another is forbidden by a large potential barrier." (Theoretical Physics, Nature, 1986, Vol 320, p. 679) The very large energy values for de Sitter space are given midway through the first page of this thread. To access these vast energies by breaching the potential barrier towards de Sitter space, a breaching which is then only a function of energy in the classical picture, may easily be accomplished with those energies that are now employed at Fermilab that are essentially equal to those found at the point origin of our Universe. i.e., the Big Bang. Such a breaching, must then be generative of a Type Ia Supernova.
All the children will thank you for your prompt efforts on their behalf, and may the good God have mercy on our souls.
All Good Wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
ah ha! I've been trying to figure out why I think this thread should go. I mean, there are tons of pointless arguments and outrageous statements made at sci-forums on an hourly basis so what bugs me about this particular thread? Then it occurred to me what it is, this isn't a discussion, this thread is essentially spam. Perhaps not in a commercial sense but it's intellectual spam. The primary poster just broadcasts the same idea over and over but ignores the discussion, theres no back-and-forth.
I think there are very few justifiable reasons to close a thread but spam is certainly one of them.
NOTE :Since the thread starter can keep saying the same thing over and over I thought I'd do the same by pasting my earlier post in rebuttal to the continuation of this thread.
Moderator, for the love of god, lock this thread.
I think there are very few justifiable reasons to close a thread but spam is certainly one of them.
NOTE :Since the thread starter can keep saying the same thing over and over I thought I'd do the same by pasting my earlier post in rebuttal to the continuation of this thread.
Moderator, for the love of god, lock this thread.
This is sciforum's longest-running thread. It's sort of like a decrepit old building that you can't tear down because of its historic value.
Also, this guy has the dependability of a cesium clock. It's sort of beyond spam at this point. It's like it went so far into the spam zone that it crossed all the way through, and came out the other side as some sort of bargain meat product that's equally silly but somehow more palatable.
Also, this guy has the dependability of a cesium clock. It's sort of beyond spam at this point. It's like it went so far into the spam zone that it crossed all the way through, and came out the other side as some sort of bargain meat product that's equally silly but somehow more palatable.