Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

Well, I'll keep thinking about it.

I wonder what is going on (or not) in the sense of non-locality with these particles and energies? This would, in effect, mean that some of the predictions of orthodox quantum formalism are incorrect.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone for prompt actions in this most tragic concern.

The collider at Fermilab has again established a new record for luminosity with 54.17E30 at 978.53 GeV. The penetrance toward de Sitter space is defined as the breaching of a large potential barrier which may be subject to quantum tunnelling as shown in the classic work of Malcolm Perry, Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe? (Reference given several times in the preceeding thread). A potential barrier can be overcome, however, in a classic sense simply as a function of energy. It may, therefore, be expected that as the energies at Fermilab are increased, where they are already at the levels found at the point origin of the Universe, there is an increased probability of breaching the potential barrier towards an exploding Universe, i.e., de Sitter space - thus creating a Type Ia Supernova.

Please contact the media - radio, television, newspapers and talk to them of your concerns in this connection now. This is effective!

All the children will thank you for your actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!

ALL BEST WISHES

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supenova from Experimentation
 
Welcome back Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D. (and Will Sheephogan of course)!



this is just getting sad.
 
Last edited:
I guess I haven't reached my critical point of luminosity yet buffy.

http://lhc-new-homepage.web.cern.ch/lhc-new-homepage/

The LHC boldly steps ahead of the TEVETRON.

Paul Davies (ROF. OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS U OF NEWCASTLE) is looking forward to 2007, when a huge new atom smasher the LHC, may be able to create mini wormholes at the atomic level.

Wormhole to where? It is not so much what we flick into it but what might be input from the otherside.

150.davies.fullbody.jpg


http://www.vega.org.uk/series/vpl/vpl2/index.php
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIEMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks to everyone for your most kind and prompt actions in this tragic concern.

Most sadly again, we must report that another luminosity record was set at Fermilab with a reading of 55.05E30 and now 2 days latter 58.93E30 at some 978.53 GeV. It is clear that the increase in energetics is proceeding in a positive monotonic progression that may generate a Type Ia Supernova long before the Large Hadron Collider is commissioned at CERN.

The very large energies resident in de Sitter space are very well-known to those familiar with relativistic cosmology. The probability of Supernova generation approaches 1 (one), which is absolute certainty, with each new luminosity record at Fermilab. Only contact with the various media, i.e., television, radio, newspapers and etc., can halt this progression. PLease call on me if my voice is needed in this tragic crisis.

All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls!

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Just rambling a little buffy don't worry about it. I think you guy's tossed around all this stuff deep in the thread. :)

---------------------------------------

Folding space and wormholes are the same thing from a mathematical point of view.

Take a sheet of paper, fold it in half, and then punch a hole through this folded sheet of paper, this is called "folded space". It is also called a simply-connected manifold. So, mathematically they are the same.

You have one point here at the collider, but where might you guess the other point opens? Could it be the most "locally" massive object that is the attractor, our sun? Even a hole several atoms wide between the Earth and the sun would have devastating consequences depending upon how long it stayed open.

If the scale of quantum gravity is near a TeV, the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will be producing one black hole (BH) about every second, thus qualifying as a BH factory. With the Hawking temperature of a few hundred GeV, these rapidly evaporating BHs could produce new, undiscovered particles with masses ~100 GeV.

In the end all forces can be traced back to symmetries. From our past experience there is no reason to believe that there couldn't be a global symmetry that governs all forces. Think for a moment of the pressure differences that could be initiated between these unknown's, by mere locality.

SN1987A brought into focus the central problem of supernova astrophysics: that massive stars explode far more readily in the real universe than they do in the simulated world within large computers. Computer models used by astrophysicists to test their understanding of how a supernova works. Within such models supernovas either refuse to explode or do so with great reluctance.

A maxim in physics is that if you look where no one has looked before, you may find what none has found before. The standard model is clearly incomplete. It has approximately 39 "adjustable" parameters - particle masses, force constants, and so on, which must have their basis in some deeper and more fundamental underlying aspects of nature.

Where is the true bridge between forces?

"About 70% of the energy in the universe is in the vacuum, about 5% is in the form of normal matter (protons, planets, stars, galaxies, etc.), and the remaining 25% is "dark matter", mysterious invisible particles that inhabit the haloes of galaxies. This new understanding raises far more questions then it answers. Why and how does the vacuum store energy? What is the dark matter? Why is the energy from the Big Bang distributed in this particular way? Is the energy in the vacuum constant with time, or is it changing? Could the vacuum suddenly decide to dump its energy and restart the Big Bang?"

http://www.cs.sun.ac.za/~jcombrink/AlternateWebsite/altvw96.html
 
Last edited:
blackholesun ... you asked for it.

I'm not even going to beg Will to shut the hell up this time. THEY WERE LEAVING! they were going to move onto another site to 'share the word', but no, you had to start it up again.

If you really are curious I promise you can find whatever Will or the good Dr. can contribute has been said by them already, repeatedly infact, in the first 5 pages of this thread. If you're that bored, try beating your head against a wall.

Just a warning though, feel free to find out for yourself.
 
Last edited:
He who has the last laugh laughs best... Meanwhile it is reassuring that this is thread is still alive, or should I say illuminated.

Meaning that those mad scientists didn't succeed at Fermi lab and I think that we can very soon can apply for the Guiness Book of Records, if Mysql don't run out of serverspace first
 
I hope the point is they do succeed Vortex. And safely. Another point is; I am a reasonable person and understand the basic's, many more out there don't have a damn clue, if I am finding it difficult - studying my ass off, to understand why there is no issue here, then there is an issue, in government, funding, psychology, society and theory and maybe even in religious beliefs. The folks that are paying the bill have the right to understand it is safe, reasonable and prudent science they are paying for. It seems to me when I sent a letter of inquiry to Fermilab, they should have responded with something? A direction, course of study to review, the Mathematica, something to say we appreciate your interest and concern and rely upon factor "x" for safety. Then I and anyone else can discuss and debate factor "x" and cast our votes to the appropriate funding sources with a thumbs up from the private tax paying sector.
 
Will. It would have happened by now. Cosmic rays hit the atmosphere with far more energy than anything we've come up with in the lab. Go ahead, do some searching. It's true.

Sorry buffy. I didn't mean to keep going with this. But I hate kooks. He talks like he learned his physics from the movie "Event Horizon". It's dribble.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks to everyone for your prompts actions in this most tragic concern.

The appended emergency news release is illustrative of the relationship between those highest-energies found on earth that are employed in the collider ring at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory as well as those found in the largest cosmic rays reaching our planet. Alas, the values for those energies employed in the ring at Fermilab that are cited in the attachment are already out-of-date as we hasten to our doom via a highest-energy physics laboratory mischance.

All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf - and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

ALL GOOD WISHES

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Paul W. Dixon said:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks to everyone for your prompts actions in this most tragic concern.
Click to expand...

Three years and still going.

I suggest we finally close the thread, where are the moderators ?
 
Well, wet1 is the mod... but he hasn't been online since Prof made the changes to the forum a while back.

This guy's posts are funny enough that it doesn't seem much harm him posting here.
 
Nasor said:
This thread is a historic part of Sciforums.
Click to expand...
Exactly! And when the world is obliterated in one blinding flash, we will all be able to point to this thread and...

Oh, wait a second. I think I sense a hole in my logic.
 
Nasor said:
No way! This thread is a historic part of Sciforums.
Click to expand...

Yes, I agree, but the scientific debate about it is over here, and now it serves no longer a purpose here on SCI-forums... where SCI is supposed to stand for Science...

That seems to be changing lately, hence the call for closing old, dead threads for a start :)
 
Is SciForums starts runing out of space to store threads, I definitely cast my vote for getting rid of this one. As long as it is not crowding out something more sensible, why not let it stay?

The world would be a duller place without some harmless lunatics and eccentrics. Why suppress what they want to rant about?

Anyone annoyed by Paul can decide to ignore him.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATINON AT FERMILAB

Your most prompt actions in regards to this tragic concern are gratefully appreciated.

The increments in energetics at Fermilab have accelerated since there has been almost one magnitude (x 10) increase since 5 February 2004 at 55.50 E30 to 20 February 2004 at 63.25E30 luminosity at near 2TeV. It is of greatest importance that the various media be contacted to avert this final catastrophic test of relativistic cosmology. Type Ia supernova, which are the phenomena predicted in this theortetical exegesis, typically out shine their host galaxy for several weeks. We rush headlong to our doom in this grave emergency.

All the children will thank you for your prompt efforts on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top