Are we discussing me, or our perceptions of the video?So do you behave in the same way as those guys?
Are we discussing me, or our perceptions of the video?So do you behave in the same way as those guys?
I'm interested in why you would think that those guys were not harassing that girl.Are we discussing me, or our perceptions of the video?
Well thats a whole different question thanI'm interested in why you would think that those guys were not harassing that girl.
Only thing I can come up with is that you think it's normal behaviour.
Yes, it does.sculptor said:.3% does not, repeat NOT = "all the time".
If you found out that most of the women experiencing it did feel harassed, would that affect your considerations?milkweed said:What I said was I dont consider most of the stuff Harassment.
I dont consider most of what was displayed in the video as harassment.
But on first view the man walking along side for several minutes, in real life I would have been very uncomfortable with that. However on second view, I noticed no comments were made from third parties while he was walking alongside.
So I watched that again and listened to tone of voice as he acknowledged her and I wondered. Did he walk along side of her as a self appointed protector? An I'll be a nice guy and walk her through this neighborhood so shes safe? He didnt keep talking to her (like another individual looking to meet up). And I would not have been as uncomfortable with the guy wanting to meet up, as he was talking and I would have known what his motive was (and could have said Not interested).
Videos like this dont impress me.
And 20-30 years from now shes going to look back fondly on the days when she would turn heads, and miss those "how ya doing babe" moments.
King said, "I am not going to get upset because somebody said, 'Hey girl, you look good today!' You know what I say? I twirl and say 'Thank you.' It would be different if they were throwing you on the ground and saying, 'Hey, I want to boink your brains out!"
Suggest all you want but its Not the same thing. Women were not subjecting this woman to "What are you looking at?" questions on a train/subway (though it happens).milkweed,
Let me suggest something to you. The equivalent experience for a man would be sitting on a train (say) and having some big guy start talking to you across the carriage, saying "What are you looking at?" when you're just doing what everybody does on a train.
Do you think that kind of behaviour would be harassing or intimidating at all?
See, for men the implied threat is usually violence. For women, it's sexual violence. Because men are the perpetrators in both cases, most of the time. The guy trying to pick a fight with you in a bar because you glanced at "his girl" is the male equivalent of some of the guys you're seeing in the video here.
Because I watched the video again and contemplated that maybe the mans motive WASNT nefarious because well... Most Men Are Not Rapists. And maybe I shouldnt assign negative behavior to everything I encounter when dealing with the multitude of personalities (mostly harmless) that exist in this world.So, a big guy just walking along beside you inside your personal space is not at all harassing, you say. But you're sending mixed messages. First you say that you would have felt uncomfortable if that happened to you. But then, all of a sudden, your own feelings don't count - it's all about whether third parties notice anything or react. It seems to me that you're trying to distance yourself from the woman's experience and to put yourself in the shoes of a distant observer. Why is that?
Well, maybe if she had said leave me alone when he first said Hey rather than ignore him he would not have Walked Alongside Her. And we dont know what he would have done if she would have clued him, you are making me uncomfortable because she remained silent.Did the guy offer protection? Why didn't he say "Hey there. Would you like me to walk alongside you in case some nasty men try to walk alongside you uninvited?" In fact, why didn't he say anything for the whole five minutes he was walking with her?
How would you feel if some guy started walking silently beside you, following your every move for five minutes? You'd be fine with it, would you? Not at all concerned about your wallet, or with moving away?
And here we go. I am part of the problem because I see things from a different point of view. Because I dont feel threatened by the multitude of human interactions and I dont automatically assign wicked, evil, sinful, iniquitous, egregious, heinous, atrocious, vile, foul, abominable, odious, depraved, monstrous, fiendish, diabolical, unspeakable, despicable, sexually motivated attributes to people.That's because you're part of the problem, it seems.
I notice how you avoided answering the direct question that was put to you. Do you greet women who are strangers on the street? Do you cat call? Do you walk silently beside women? And if not, why not? Don't you want to protect them?
If you're young and attractive you should be up for a bit of harassment. Right? You should see it as a good thing. It means somebody wants to rape you, which is better than people ignoring you.
That's a twirl and a "thank you" every five minutes, every time you walk down the street, every day all day for twenty years.motor daddy said:King said, "I am not going to get upset because somebody said, 'Hey girl, you look good today!' You know what I say? I twirl and say 'Thank you.'
Yep. A point of view that supports and excuses and defends street harassment of women is a large part of the problem.milkweed said:And here we go. I am part of the problem because I see things from a different point of view
No kidding. So subjecting a woman to abusive "casual" interactions every time she walks down the public sidewalk creates an unhealthy situation - right?milkweed said:And its unhealthy for a person to go though life fearing casual interaction.
That's a twirl and a "thank you" every five minutes, every time you walk down the street, every day all day for twenty years.
No idea. You would know your neighborhood better than I - which streets should women avoid, in Kansas, if they don't want to have to twirl and say "thank you" to potentially dangerous creeps once a block or so?motor daddy said:What street in Kansas are you referring to?
No. Is your attempt at deflection by playing stupid deliberate?motor daddy said:Are you suggesting that a lady walks 24/7/365/20???
No idea. You would know your neighborhood better than I - which streets should women avoid, in Kansas, if they don't want to have to twirl and say "thank you" to potentially dangerous creeps once a block or so?
No. Is your attempt at deflection by playing stupid deliberate?
How would you respond the five hundredth time, the five thousandth, it happened to you?
Why yes - how am I supposed to know which are the bad streets in Kansas?motor daddy said:So you're saying women should avoid streets in Kansas, but you're not sure which streets those are?
If you guys in Kansas don't distinguish kind neighbors from harassing creeps, the women in Kansas have bigger problems than anyone knew.motor daddy said:How do you differentiate the creep from the kind neighbor?
Nope.motor daddy said:If the kind neighbor says you look nice in that dress, do you turn to him and call him a harassing creep?
Uh, lessee: he's not your neighbor, he's not being kind, there are many guys like him pestering you whenever you walk down the street, they are acting like creeps, it's a pain in the neck to deal with him and a continual threat of escalation if you fail to deal with him, he's a stranger with no accountability to you or anyone, you have other things to do than twirl and say "thank you" to him or somebody like him every block of your daily travels,motor daddy said:If not, what is different about the guy on the street that tells you you look nice in that dress?
They hire bodyguards, hide their routes and dwellings and identities and phone numbers, send assistants to run their errands, and so forth. It's a continual problem and a serious threat, to them.motor daddy said:Maybe you could ask the Stars from Hollywood how they react to so much attention
So you are claiming honest inability to read with comprehension. That makes sense - I'll try to anticipate your special needs in the future.motor daddy said:No. Is your attempt at deflection by playing stupid deliberate?
No, I'm trying to make heads or tails of your bizarre statements. Just how many times does a woman get harassed walking down Pennsylvania Ave for 10 hours? Then how do you equate those numbers to every 5 minutes for 20 years?? You make stupid statements I'll call you on them all day long! Stupid is stupid, period!
Why yes - how am I supposed to know which are the bad streets in Kansas?
If you guys in Kansas don't distinguish kind neighbors from harassing creeps, the women in Kansas have bigger problems than anyone knew.
Nope.
Uh, lessee: he's not your neighbor,
he's not being kind,
there are many guys like him pestering you whenever you walk down the street,
they are acting like creeps,
it's a pain in the neck to deal with him and a continual threat of escalation if you fail to deal with him,
he's a stranger with no accountability to you or anyone,
you have other things to do than twirl and say "thank you" to him or somebody like him every block of your daily travels, ,
are these differences invisible to you?,
Are you honestly unable, yourself, to distinguish street harassment from neighborly friendliness ? ,
They hire bodyguards, hide their routes and dwellings and identities and phone numbers, send assistants to run their errands, and so forth. It's a continual problem and a serious threat, to them. ,
So you are claiming honest inability to read with comprehension. That makes sense - I'll try to anticipate your special needs in the future.
Those strangers on the street are just being nice guys? You are extremely naive if you believe that.
It's not me hiring the bodyguards, hiding my phone number, employing professionals to run my daily errands that require walking down the public street. It's those Hollywood stars you recommended I look to for examples of how to handle all this friendly neighborliness women find themselves immersed in while walking down the public sidewalk.motor daddy said:They hire bodyguards, hide their routes and dwellings and identities and phone numbers, send assistants to run their errands, and so forth. It's a continual problem and a serious threat, to them. ,
So people telling them they look great in that dress is seriously threatening?? Wow!! You have a warped sense of reality.
Not at all. Neither are most women - so when they tell you they are being harassed, you might want to pay attention. And when they post a simple little documentary video, it's especially easy for you - no reading comprehension issues.motor daddy said:Are you honestly unable to distinguish between a truck load of compliments, and harassment?
I want to see the video of how the bodyguards handle you when you follow Gayle King down the street telling her she looks nice in that dress.motor daddy said:I want to see the video of Hillary walking down Main Street Kansas, for 10 hours.
...and after that, Gayle King!
It's not me hiring the bodyguards, hiding my phone number, employing professionals to run my daily errands that require walking down the public street. It's those Hollywood stars you recommended I look to for examples of how to handle all this friendly neighborliness women find themselves immersed in while walking down the public sidewalk.
That was your recommendation for examples. Are their methods your recommendations for how women should deal with this shit? Kind of expensive.
Not at all. Neither are most women - so when they tell you they are being harassed, you might want to pay attention. And when they post a simple little documentary video, it's especially easy for you - no reading comprehension issues.
cluelusshusbund said: ↑
Do you thank men are inherently more prone (nature) to this type of behavior than women.???
Yes, I think they are. But I think that what makes men do it is a combination of nature and nurture (as with most other complex behavioural traits), so I voted "other" in the poll.