How is it not? Where did the universe come from? God. How does consciousness arise? God. How should we act? God tells us. It's very simplistic.
Ah yes of course.
How is it not? Where did the universe come from? God. How does consciousness arise? God. How should we act? God tells us. It's very simplistic.
No... like patterns, organisation and complex behaviour emerge from simple interactions.Like a methane bog, you mean?
I don't know. Does it matter? Should we not value spirituality for what it is, rather than where it comes from?Hmm an interesting notion. Does it?
No... like patterns, organisation and complex behaviour emerge from simple interactions.
I don't know. Does it matter? Should we not value spirituality for what it is, rather than where it comes from?
I'm not arguing origin, I'm posing a question about whether origin affects the value of spirituality.You're the one who is arguing origin, why ask me?:shrug:
In this cartoon, for example, spirituality is what prompts the man to question the purpose of himself and the world.
Do you think that it matters whether or not the origin of his spirituality is biochemical?
Does it?Sam said:It matters to him, does it not?
Why not? Why be reductionist about it?If biochemistry is the origin of spirituality, why call it spirituality ?
Does it?
The man's spirituality is valuable in and of itself, is it not?
Does its value depend on whether it is material in origin or not?
Why not? Why be reductionist about it?
Does it?
The man's spirituality is valuable in and of itself, is it not?
Does its value depend on whether it is material in origin or not?
Reductionist ?
If it's of biological origin, the word 'spirituality' does quite fit.
'Spirituality' means: of incorporeal or immaterial nature.
Also:
spir·it
–noun
1. the principle of conscious life; the vital principle in humans, animating the body or mediating between body and soul.
2. the incorporeal part of humans: present in spirit though absent in body.
3. the soul regarded as separating from the body at death.
Does its value depend on whether it is material in origin or not?
If biochemistry is the origin of spirituality, why call it spirituality ?
Why not? Why be reductionist about it?
Reductionist ? If it's of biological origin, the word 'spirituality' does quite fit.
'Spirituality' means: of incorporeal or immaterial nature.
Well that's what the dictionary says... I think it's a bit more subtle in practice.
I think that spirituality is the awareness of something about yourself that is more than your body. The instinctive dualist nature of the human mind. That which prompts questions like "What's it all about? Is death the end? Why something rather than nothing?"
Some people think that this comes from a true dualism of material and immaterial. Some think that it emerges from the material.
But I think that this aspect of the human condition is valuable in and of itself. The origin of the thing (its fundamental nature) is a separate question to the existence and value of the thing.
Yes, if spirituality were biochemical, then it could be duplicated.yes
yes it does
spirituality boils down to an experience
if what we experience is solely caused by electrochemical reactions within the brain, it can be mimicked
pete 2, a replicant
a zombie
is that you?
It's just a label, a part of the language. We call electrons particles because of their apparent manifestation, not their fundamental nature.Ok, but I was merely referring to the naming of it.
Surely you see that the word would be unfitting if it's all down to biology ?
It's just a label, a part of the language. We call electrons particles because of their apparent manifestation, not their fundamental nature.