Really?I can't follow your reasoning here well either. It seems... fragmented?
I'm claiming that:
A) -ND-'s claim to be the "one we're all waiting for" is delusional.
A1) and it's highly likely that most people aren't waiting for anyone.
B) that there's no evidence we get multiple lives.
C) and that I don't "believe" in science, since it proves itself. No "belief" needed.
How fragmented is that?
Or was your post a misquote and it's -ND-'s reasoning you can't follow?