i dont think its about right and wrong.. i think its about finding a clue in each of them
Somone who knows God.!!!
- Thread starter cluelusshusbund
- Start date
i dont think its about right and wrong.. i think its about finding a clue in each of them
Its no coiencidence that my name begins wit "clue".!!!
That is bullshit. It requires belief just like anything else that gives answers to life. You are just a bullshitter, but you are only bullshitting your self.
Which just goes to show you have no clue as to what you're talking about.
Are you certan that the God you beleive in created life.???
Is ther a posibility that evidence coud be presented to you that woud make you beleive that you'r God does not esist.???
thats just the thing..there isnt ANY evidence that can be found/discovered/tested.. for either side of the arguement that will convince the other side..
there is just as many arguements 'for' as there are 'against'..
in the end it comes down to choosing what to believe in...
either/or requires some faith..
Originally Posted by cluelusshusbund
Are you certan that the God you beleive in created life.???
But specificly... are you certan that the God you beleive in created life.???
An do you thank thers a posibility that evidence coud be presented to you that woud make you beleive that you'r God does not esist.???
Are you certan that the God you beleive in created life.???
But specificly... are you certan that the God you beleive in created life.???
An do you thank thers a posibility that evidence coud be presented to you that woud make you beleive that you'r God does not esist.???
to answer your question....
no..my beliefs are a choice, not a state of being..any evidence that were presented to me would be viewed with 'god colored glasses' since those were the glasses i choose to wear..
i do also have an armchair interest in the sciences and do keep up with all that is published in Scientific America and Discover..to date there is still no certainty about origins of life..all theories about it is just that..theories
yes the same can be said of gods genesis...
i choose to believe in god because of most all religions have the basic understanding 'its for the good of man'.
there are some ppl involved with religion that do have a clue about what its about..
the hardest part is sorting through what parts are man made and what parts are truly from god..
Originally Posted by cluelusshusbund
Are you certan that the God you beleive in created life.???
An do you thank thers a posibility that evidence coud be presented to you that woud make you beleive that you'r God does not esist.???
Thats a diference between science an beleifs... beleifs tend to be set in stone regardless of evidence to the contrary... science is self-correctin as evidence presents itself.!!!
Is you'r beleif in you'r God 100%... 100% of the time... or do you'r God colored glasses com off ever now an then.???
What about evoluton... do you also see that as "jus a theory".???
yes but until that science is corrected they maintain certainty about the way things are..
my belief is 100 % of the time.. and the glasses do come off once in a while..to be able to see and understand differant perspectives, you cant finish the puzzle if you are looking for a piece you already have..
without trying to get into a fact war (i dont know everything..)
evolution still has not been proven..there are still arguements for and against that are compelling...the closest they found was kinowick(seriously misspelled) man they found frozen in the ice, oldest intact corpse from caveman days..physiologicly he is identical to us (-hygene and medical attention)..
and the other arguement i like is if we are descended from monkeys why did some of us stay monkeys? (differant branch doesnt count cause still how come they didnt evolve)
in my opinion the only thing that evolves is our knowledge and technology..
It's not absolute certainty, it's confidence.
Evolution often splits off to create new species, leaving the old species the same. That is a bit of a misconception, because no animal stays the same, even if the outer appearance seems unchanged. The ancestor if the penguin probably looked like most shore birds, which are still around today.
Evolution often splits off to create new species, leaving the old species the same. That is a bit of a misconception, because no animal stays the same, even if the outer appearance seems unchanged. The ancestor if the penguin probably looked like most shore birds, which are still around today.
Originally Posted by cluelusshusbund
Thats a diference between science an beleifs... beleifs tend to be set in stone regardless of evidence to the contrary... science is self-correctin as evidence presents itself.!!! ”
No... scientificaly... science ant about certanty... its about gatherin informaton... if enuff factual informaton is gathered then those facts can rize to the level of "theory".!!!
------------
“ Is you'r beleif in you'r God 100%... 100% of the time... or do you'r God colored glasses com off ever now an then.??? ”
To be clear... do you ever have any dout that God is real... or are you always certan he is real... an if you'r always certan... what do you mean by... the God colored glasses do com off once in a while.???
-----------
“ What about evoluton... do you also see that as "jus a theory".??? ”
Evoluton cant be provin... som facts coud com along to show that evolluton is not what we thout it was... however... evoluton is fact an theory.!!!
Ther are arguments about the exact process of evoluton an no dout always be as new informaton is gathered... but evoluton is a fact.
From "cave man" days an identical to us???... i woud like to see a link to that informaton.!!!
We ant decended from monkeys... apes are our ancesters... but monkeys an apes an humans all continue to evolve.!!!
Thats a diference between science an beleifs... beleifs tend to be set in stone regardless of evidence to the contrary... science is self-correctin as evidence presents itself.!!! ”
No... scientificaly... science ant about certanty... its about gatherin informaton... if enuff factual informaton is gathered then those facts can rize to the level of "theory".!!!
------------
“ Is you'r beleif in you'r God 100%... 100% of the time... or do you'r God colored glasses com off ever now an then.??? ”
To be clear... do you ever have any dout that God is real... or are you always certan he is real... an if you'r always certan... what do you mean by... the God colored glasses do com off once in a while.???
-----------
“ What about evoluton... do you also see that as "jus a theory".??? ”
Evoluton cant be provin... som facts coud com along to show that evolluton is not what we thout it was... however... evoluton is fact an theory.!!!
Ther are arguments about the exact process of evoluton an no dout always be as new informaton is gathered... but evoluton is a fact.
From "cave man" days an identical to us???... i woud like to see a link to that informaton.!!!
We ant decended from monkeys... apes are our ancesters... but monkeys an apes an humans all continue to evolve.!!!
Last edited:
there are sometimes i get mad at him and ignore him..but he is still there..
that would require me knowing how to spell kenowick...
If you mean Kennewick then you've misunderstood the controversy.
It's not about a caveman being identical to us so much as him appearing to be Southeast Asian and NOT a Native American.
Which if true would mean that Native Americans possibly aren't Native (or at least not the original Natives).
Wiki (per link) has a reasonable write-up.
thats the guy!...
he is still the oldest intact corpse..and still evidence of not changing/evolving
where are our wings?how bout a second 'hangy down thingy'..another hand/arm would be more productive....
Well i dont read Scientific American an not everbody keeps up wit science very good... but Its obvous how much you keep up wit it by the kind of questons you ask :bugeye: