You have yet to actually do what I said and show there's a contradiction. You simply saying "There's a contradition!" doesn't mean there is. If I call you a murderer does the accusation mean you are or do I have to provide evidence? If special relativity is self contradicting then you should be able to use two different methods to describe the same phenomena and get different results. That would be an explicit demonstration that the theory is self contradictory.
But you haven't done that at all. You simply say "No relativity of Acceleration, therefore
no relativity of causation.". No evidence. No derivation. No methodology. Simply a vacuous claim. And its made all the weaker by the fact that special relativity was the theory which brought into the foreground the notion of locality and non-trivial restrictions on cause and effect. Special relativity is equivalent to having causality preserved.
It's a common issue to ask in such things as quantum field theory if operators preserve causality, if they adhere to how special relativity constricts dynamics to make sure cause and effect are the correct way around. Of course you're unaware of this as you've never studied any of those things. Opening the textbook 'An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory' by Peskin and Schroder causality is pretty much the first thing they discuss, explaining how quantum field theory is causally consistent, due to the addition of special relativity to the possibly non-causal quantum mechanics.
Special relativity doesn't violate causality, it's equivalent to it. They are one and the same. If you violate one then you've violated the other. If you'd ever actually studied the structure of special relativity space-time you'd know this but we've already established you like to make wild claims about things you refuse to read. And yet you whine about the honesty of physicist!
