Intention is one of the most difficult, if not impossible, issues for a prosecutor to prove in a court of law. Thus it most often comes back to "He said, She said", which is damned difficult for a jury to decide.
I'm tellin' y'all, it's simply best to get the girl to sign a document in front of a legal notary, then videotape the entire sexual encounter in order to protect yourselves from the charge of rape.
she can fuck your brains out that night, then the very next morning she can swear out a complaint of rape ...
If y'all want my advice, stay the hell away from women other than known whores and prostitutes. Women ain't nothin' but trouble for men (and vice versa, too!).
This happened in sydney, an 18 year old girl got drinking and AGREED to have sex with three males aged 21-22.
Afterwards she decided that she told them to stop and they didn't - and accused them of raping her.
The three men were acquitted.
I agree, (Baron Max). That's why many rapists who should have been convicted are instead acquitted.
Do you imagine that shouting your misogyny to the world will help you win friends and influence people?
A good example of the criminal justice system working as it should.
Well, that's a shitty thing to say, James!! Our courts might not be perfect, but when someone is found guilty or innocent in our courts of law, then that should be the end of it.
What ye're saying is only that you know better than all of the juries who acquitted those men who were accused of rape. What makes you such a know-it-all, and the jurors such fools? Bad attitude, James!
Judge not lest ye' be also judged!
James, it doesn't necessarily say anything about the man if a woman fucks his brains out the night before then charges him with rape the next morning.
It's well known that "crazy pussy" gives the best sex but you can't trust the women who are like that.
They seem perfectly straight if not more than perfectly straight in the daylight then they go crazy in bed. I would far rather trust a blatant whore than someone like that, as long as she didn't take advantage of me while I was drunk.
No, it should not be illegal.
If you are shitfaced drunk and you choose to have sex with someone, that's not rape. You may wake up in the morning and think 'why was I so stupid?' but it was still a choice.
What if, after a night of drinking, instead of waking up in bed with Henry Gibson she wakes up in an ICU because she wrecked her car--and perhaps killed a carload of people? Who ya gonna lay the blame on this time?
simple solution don't have sex if any person involved is drunk
No one on this planet can trace linage through completely sober couplings of their ancestors...
This doesn't effect me cuz I'll never get laid lmao
Well geeze dude. Are we talking about a typical Friday night in a bar where everyone deliberately gets a buzz on to forget their jobs and a few people drink too much because they have a little more to forget? No two people behave the same way when they've had too much to drink. Some people deliberately get drunk to lose their inhibitions because they feel they've been too uptight all week. It's impossible for anyone to second-guess them and say, "Hey, you're too drunk for me to believe that you really want to have sex with me."If another driver intentionally swerved into her, I would blame the other driver. Her being drunk doesn't excuse the intentional acts of others. It might be something to consider in mitigation of punishment.