You have no evidence. My question was whether or not belief without evidence is enough to condemn. Only through the using of religion is such unjust thinking unobjectionable. No reputable court of law would convict a person on belief without evidence. God couldn’t even be a witness. No address to send a subpoena. If God did have an address that a court of law could use, then God could be placed on trial charging him with genocide and crimes against humanity.
A sign on the road Says speed limit 100kmh.
A driver passes it and continues doing 140kmh
Police car stops driver gives fine 250$
Driver goes to court contesting the fine.
Court rules that adequate notice was given.
The Authority has decided that a sign on the side of the road saying "Speed limit 100kmh" is enough notification for drivers. Irrespective of the driver who contends that doing 140km along that road is safe and acceptable behaviour. The drivers disagreement with the authority comes to nothing. He will pay the fine.
I know, nobody is allowed to disagree without facing conviction. A guilty verdict should be based in fact not belief. You talk as though the bible was absolute fact when the actual evidence provided through science and archeology has proven its not.
Take a book that is known to be inaccurate and condemn or convict people using the false information it contains. According to the book of Genesis the earth is flat. Before anybody can be condemned or convicted or sent to hell a flat earth must be produced first. Religion's sense of justice is not.
What you agree with and what you disagree with is up to you. The sign is there. The message that God deems adequate is there. Read it as you pass in life, do what you will to do.
So Be It.
All Praise The Ancient Of Days