Actually what I am doing is analyzing how scientific "facts" are presented as such, within the folds of its own discipline.Can we take a second to compare that to the way religion works.
A person who has read a 2000 year old book tells other people about the 2000 year old book and convinces some people that what is in the 2000 year old book is true without any evidence besides the 2000 year old book.
I don't think any religious people can criticize the scientific method when that's their own method for learning.
What I am not doing is overhauling the epistemology to fit some chip on my shoulder (which is what you are doing, when you try and reduce the means of religiosity outside of the normative descriptions that frame it)