erm ... the omnipotent one usually attributed as being the cause of all causes ... how about you?What god?
Not all atheists .... just the philosophical onesNope.
erm ... the omnipotent one usually attributed as being the cause of all causes ... how about you?What god?
Not all atheists .... just the philosophical onesNope.
erm ..... I wasn't aware where we suddenly switched from discussing a topic of logic to a topic of truth, but anyway, I'm happy enough to go in that direction now that you bring it up ....You are just talking out your ass. You have no evidence that is the least bit true.
heheYou don't know any entities with "greater potency than humans"
well actually I donor do you know their requirements for designing anything.
Unlike you when you make claims like "I know what you know", eh?You just pretend and make shit up.
aside from your personal gene pool, what makes them the best?Humans are the best example we currently have of purposeful design,
Life, its environment and how it interects with its envioronment (evolution) are not seperable and don't have a discrete beginning.
erm ... the omnipotent one usually attributed as being the cause of all causes ... how about you?
You produce this alleged evidence and it is replicated and verified or it fails to be verified and replicated.Actually I have plenty of evidence that it is true.
Now what?
You should look up the word "omnipotent."is if you are omnipotent
I know that design has the requirement of potency.
What evidence do you have that this is true?
aside from your personal gene pool, what makes them the best?
The other examples we have are generally very limited and not terribly prolific. Termites are probably the most sophisticated, their housing structures are better than ours by far, but that is their only design.
verified an replicated by who exactly?Originally Posted by lightgigantic
Actually I have plenty of evidence that it is true.
Now what?
”
You produce this alleged evidence and it is replicated and verified or it fails to be verified and replicated.
Ironically, the only way for your all-knowing statement to be true is if you possessed omnipotence, omniscience, etc .......You still don't know any entities with "greater potency than humans" but by all means introduce them if you wish to assert that you do.
Beats me why you find this point controversial. All design requires some degree of potency“
I know that design has the requirement of potency.
”
You don't know that. You are just assuming it.
Even falling off a log requires the potency to get on top of one in the first placeCreating a universe could be easier than falling off a log for all you know.
meanwhile you have the audacity to declare (in a world where we cannot even design a computer or car without an after sales assistance network) that creating a universe stands to be as easy as falling off a log ....You are just making crap up because you like the way it makes you feel.
um dudeIn fact, given the size and scope of a universe, it seems for more reasonable that no potency is required.
heheYou are wholly ignorant about every single aspect of gods.
All you are doing is making up fantasy gods.
duherm ... the omnipotent one usually attributed as being the cause of all causes ... how about you?
”
There is no such thing evident. You have a misattribution.
I'm not neccesarily saying there is no god - just that he's nowhere to be found in nature - perhaps there is somewhere else to look though - I dunno
I find this debate as a whole to be a tiresome repetition of two degrees of absolutist views claiming one side is right when human beings will never be able to fully grasp the scope and meaning of existence and how it came to be.
sureNever and never fully hold different connotations do they not?
Life itself and all of the current research into creating synthetic life, which is coming quite along quite nicely.
The place to look is inside. We have a conscience that must deal with suffering and death. Every religion deals with the human conscience. There are several views in the field of philosophy:
Do you know of any view that answers to the problem of evil in a satisfactory way?
So IOW the capacities of design are very much determined by the communities that they appear in.
the hierarchy of design sophistication is top down
verified an replicated by who exactly?
Ironically
Beats me why you find this point controversial. All design requires some degree of potency
meanwhile you have the audacity to declare (in a world where we cannot even design a computer or car without an after sales assistance network) that creating a universe stands to be as easy as falling off a log ....
even if I was making things up, its not clear why you would personally hold that against me
So during the interim of your lack of evidence you can use the word "god"
Evil is the absense of genuine love. Genuine love is selfless love, expecting nothing in return except the benefit of the other person. Hence evil is a form of selfishness coupled with a conscience that knows better.
Genuine love is selfless love, expecting nothing in return except the benefit of the other person.