Pure, Single, Positive Bases of Existence are Absurd

I know - you feel permitted to troll and have license to play that sound-bite when others reciprocate with you accordingly

Playing the victim, huh?
Anything to avoid your responsibility as a theist, eh?

You want us to take your judgment of us seriously, that we are supposed to accept that your judgment of us is as if God Himself judged us - but you refuse to take any responsibility for us.

Shame on you.
 
Signal,

If you claim to know the Absolute Truth, if you claim to know God, if you claim to know what is good for others: then you have responsibility for your listeners.


Short of informing anyone who will listen, what other responsibility does
such a person have?


Theism isn't a matter of caveat emptor.


Theist describes a person who has a belief in God, nothing more
and nothing less.


jan.
 
Playing the victim, huh?
No, just imitating your behavior - ie troll around and insult people and then accuse them of being a meanie when they respond accordingly.
Anything to avoid your responsibility as a theist, eh?
And what is a theists responsibility to you precisely?

You want us to take your judgment of us seriously, that we are supposed to accept that your judgment of us is as if God Himself judged us - but you refuse to take any responsibility for us.
Your first task is to find a post where I offer such a judgement I guess ...

Shame on you.
Trying to make your fist bigger than my heart again, huh?
:eek:
 
You should not be :confused:.

If you claim to know the Absolute Truth, if you claim to know God, if you claim to know what is good for others: then you have responsibility for your listeners.
It seems like most people here claim to know absolute truth. They make statements about the way the world is, if not God. Above you state in certain terms what a theist must do.
 
It seems like most people here claim to know absolute truth. They make statements about the way the world is, if not God. Above you state in certain terms what a theist must do.

I do not think we should let theism be/become yet another form of politics.
 
No, just imitating your behavior - ie troll around and insult people and then accuse them of being a meanie when they respond accordingly.

The playing field is not even.
If you want it even, you will degrade theism to yet another form of politics.
Is this what you want?


And what is a theists responsibility to you precisely?

Answered above.


Your first task is to find a post where I offer such a judgement I guess ...

You talk on the topic "God" and the "individual entity's relation to God" all the time.


Trying to make your fist bigger than my heart again, huh?

A theist playing politician ...
 
The playing field is not even.
yes - for reasons I previously explained - namely your want to insult others while simultaneously demanding respect :shrug:




Answered above.
where?




You talk on the topic "God" and the "individual entity's relation to God" all the time.
and that is a judgement?




A theist playing politician ...
just reciprocating with you on the platform of your liking ;)
 
yes - for reasons I previously explained - namely your want to insult others while simultaneously demanding respect

It is the theists who want that, and in the name of God at that!



Short of informing anyone who will listen, what other responsibility does such a person have?

To tell the truth and to not mislead people.


and that is a judgement?

Yes. Every statement of is-ness is a judgment.


just reciprocating with you on the platform of your liking

I am disappointed with you. You are playing politics, while being the one to make claims that are supposedly about God.
You know that every living being is afraid of God - and you are using this to advance your political objectives.
Really cheap.
 
It is the theists who want that, and in the name of God at that!
Its what you imagine theists want - furthermore giving you the license to insult ... while simultaneously crying foul when persons reciprocate with you accordingly.

Yes. Every statement of is-ness is a judgment.
You are not explaining how a personal judgment of a theist automatically translates into a personal judgement as decreed by god (especially when there are whole treatises on the variety of theists according to their realization) ... or is there some other angle you want to bring to the table on the topic of judgments?



I am disappointed with you.
Once again, its reciprocal behavior.

You are playing politics, while being the one to make claims that are supposedly about God.
You know that every living being is afraid of God - and you are using this to advance your political objectives.
Really cheap.
I don't have a clue what you are talking about.

What I do understand however is that you are just running around making generalizing comments framed as loaded questions
 
Last edited:
Back
Top