Prove that I am not God

Reference post #440.
And this proves what? That monkeys cannot count either?
This ridiculous piece of trash pop is the best you can do to explain what?

You may want to become more literate in your knowledge of your own evolutionary history.
Is the Sloth related to Monkeys and Apes?
They are related because both are placental mammals, which share a common ancestry going back to about 90 million years ago. However, monkeys belong to the taxon Boreoeutheria, while sloths belong to Xenarthra. Those two split apart around 90 million years ago. Since about 95% of all placental mammals belong to Boreoeutheria, monkeys and sloths are about as far apart as you can get.
Click to expand...
https://www.quora.com/Are-sloths-related-to-monkeys-Is-there-such-a-thing-as-a-sloth-monkey

So your example was of the stupidest mammal that ever left the ground whereas humans evolved from the common ancestor of all apes which were the smartest mammal to leave the ground. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sloth

What you may not know is that the sloth voids once a week and must climb down to the ground where he makes a hole and when done covers it back up. This voiding is a torturous procedure, because a big sloth eats a lot in spite of his energy conservation and may produce impacted feces of several pounds and a significant percentage of his body weight.
"Lighten the load" is a Sloth's motto......:rolleyes: Hardly a divine statement.

Any other non-humorous examples of enlightening musical compositions showing abusive human behavior against a peaceful creature that bothers no one?
 
Last edited:
Capracus said:
Why, so I can respond to some more of your non answers to my questions? No thanks.
Click to expand...

Of course anyone can respond to anything. It's just that when it's done carelessly one runs the risk of being relegated to automatic irrelevance ... case in point.
 
Write4U said:
Reference post #440.
And this proves what? That monkeys cannot count either?
This ridiculous piece of trash pop is the best you can do to explain what?
Click to expand...
I believe "ridiculous piece of trash" are the operative words ...
 
Write4U said:
The assumption of possible hidden demons (gods) in the clouds is a survival mechanism, an abstract "fight or flight" response mechanism build into our evolved hominid brain functions through time immemorial. Later came the worship.
Click to expand...

Bit longer than that

In English law and its derivatives, time immemorial means the same as time out of mind, "a time before legal history and beyond legal memory". In 1275, by the first Statute of Westminster, the time of memory was limited to the reign of King Richard I, beginning 6 July 1189, the date of the King's accession.

TV program - QI S10 Ep13

:)
 
Musika said:
Of course anyone can respond to anything. It's just that when it's done carelessly one runs the risk of being relegated to automatic irrelevance ... case in point.
Click to expand...
I guess the right epistemology needs to be employed to divine your nature as well. When you petition God and get no answers, you're only option is to go where your imagination leads you. What depravities could unit Musika be hiding about its religious practices?
 
Capracus said:
I guess the right epistemology needs to be employed to divine your nature as well. When you petition God and get no answers, you're only option is to go where your imagination leads you. What depravities could unit Musika be hiding about its religious practices?
Click to expand...
I guess we will wait with bated breath to see whether you employ an epistemology greater than imagination to get such answers.
 
Michael 345 said:
Bit longer than that

In English law and its derivatives, time immemorial means the same as time out of mind, "a time before legal history and beyond legal memory". In 1275, by the first Statute of Westminster, the time of memory was limited to the reign of King Richard I, beginning 6 July 1189, the date of the King's accession.

TV program - QI S10 Ep13

:)
Click to expand...
True, it is one of the definitions of time immemorial in law.
The other more general one is;
Time in the distant past beyond memory or record: "Those carvings have been there from time immemorial".
Click to expand...
 
Capracus said:
Because Musika told me I could be.

For Musika to redefine its definition of God. Then I'd have to go find another delusional sap to get recertified.
Click to expand...
If you pass my mathematics test, I'll recertify you......;). It's easy. Tegmark estimates 32 different values (numbers) and a handful of equations.

But if you answer this, you pass:
a) e = ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_(mathematical_constant)
b) f(x) = ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_function
a) E = ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass–energy_equivalence
b) Pi = ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi
c) Psi = ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psi

Of course you wouldn't care one way or the other. You'd be just a universal non-sentient mathematical pattern, a mathematically functioning self-referential wholeness.

Pleased to make your acquaintance......:rolleyes: David Bohm introduced you before as (non-sentient) "Insight Intelligence".
 
Last edited:
Capracus said:
The problem is unit Jan, that even though the best human being is no better than the worst human being in their ability to know God's true nature, no human being that's ever existed is capable of knowing God's true nature.
Click to expand...

Do we need to know God's "true nature" to know that God Is?
If that is the case, can you explain why?

Do we need to know the ''true nature'' of everything we perceive to exist, or is your rule only applicable to knowing God?

Capracus said:
The Capracus God(actually the Musika God) would send Jesus to hell for eternity just for kicks. Does that sound like your God?
Click to expand...

I think Jesus would be glad to go to hell, if God sent him.
But as I haven't seen that particular exchange between you and Musika, I can't comment on it.

Capracus said:
According to unit Musika, you can't know the answer.
Click to expand...

I was just responding to James.
He wants to argue that I am an atheist because I don't accept you as God.
But I did accept you as God, until you said I'm the best person to know if somebody is an imposter.
I followed up on that (while I accepted you as God), then I decided that you're an imposter. Based on what you said.

If James thinks I an atheist because I don't accept you as God, then James must either be an atheist, or theist.


jan.
 
Jan Ardena said:
I followed up on that (while I accepted you as God), then I decided that you're an imposter. Based on what you said.
Click to expand...
Your God cannot be denied based on anything "He" says.
According to you, and Musika, anyway.
But if it can - show us. What was said, and how did that conflict with your God?
Jan Ardena said:
Do we need to know God's "true nature" to know that God Is?
Click to expand...
Nope. But you need to know something about God's nature to say anything about it - such as, say, that it is different somehow from that of Capracus.
 
Musika said:
Self imposed labour of digging a trench just to throw yourself in while in the middle of a thread that repeatedly reminds everyone of the perils of subject/object divides employed in the service of intellectual sloth ... and all that
Click to expand...
You forgot to mention that the Pew report shows atheists to be the people least inclined to be sloth about gaining knowledge about religion.
It's the religions themselves which breed unquestioned acceptance of religious dogma.
If you want to compare who is closest to sloth in knowledge and practice of religion it is theists. Now you can play that little piece of animal torture.

Which is really weird, being that sloth is one of the deadly sins .
religious-knowledge-01.png

Jan Ardena said:
Lol!!! :D:Do_O
jan.
Click to expand...
Yes Jan, laugh, but you cannot escape facts..:rolleyes:, atheists are better informed on religion than religious people.
Which is why they are atheist.....:)
12 worst ideas religion has unleashed on the world: Conflict, cruelty and suffering — not love and peace
Our shared moral/spiritual core matters. But religion has also promoted some of the worst ideas humanity has known
Click to expand...

https://www.salon.com/2015/05/19/12...ict_cruelty_and_suffering_not_love_and_peace/
 
Last edited:
iceaura said:
Your God cannot be denied based on anything "He" says.
According to you, and Musika, anyway.
But if it can - show us. What was said, and how did that conflict with your God?
Click to expand...

I’ve no clue what you’re on about.

Nope. But you need to know something about God's nature to say anything about it - such as, say, that it is different somehow from that of Capracus.
Click to expand...

How do you know?

Jan.
 
Yes Jan, laugh, but you cannot escape facts..:rolleyes:, atheists are better informed on religion than religious people.
Which is why they are atheist.....:)
https://www.salon.com/2015/05/19/12...ict_cruelty_and_suffering_not_love_and_peace/
Click to expand...

When it comes to God, atheists simply aren’t informed. So what use is their understanding of religion, to a theist?
I could care less about the term “religion”, and what atheists think they know.

And you’re atheist because you do not believe in God, for no other reason. :rolleyes:

Jan.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top