good luck with that...someone like me would easily conquer the world.
good luck with that...someone like me would easily conquer the world.
Let me bring up a tangential point, you don't have a consistent answer for why you care for someone or why you see a relationship or life as meaningful if you do.
That there is no point to life with no God, and we should all be running around naked having orgies all over the place.
That there is no point to life with no God, and we should all be running around naked having orgies all over the place
If God isn't real someone like me would easily conquer the world
And once again we can clearly see that SOME theists ARE sometimes little more than a nihilists with a poorly developed knowledge of self.
sorry, he doesn't speak for all theists..
good luck with that...
If God isn't real someone like me would easily conquer the world.
Let me bring up a tangential point, you don't have a consistent answer for why you care for someone or why you see a relationship or life as meaningful if you do.
He said:
He's arguing that since he, ie. Knowledge 91, hasn't counquered the world, this means that God is (possibly) real.
yes, but i chose to have fun with it, rather that point out the logical fallacies of it..
"If God isn't real someone like me would easily conquer the world. "The do point them out now.
"If God isn't real someone like me would easily conquer the world. "
fallacy of consequence..(?)
whether God is real or not would have no influence on his ability to take over the world.
Fallacy of false dilemma. There are more reasons... such as God does not exist, or God (if it exists) is not capable of making you. :shrug:But the only reason I haven't is because God has not had me do that yet
"If God isn't real someone like me would easily conquer the world. "
fallacy of consequence..(?)
whether God is real or not would have no influence on his ability to take over the world.
Fallacy of false dilemma.
Nor, then, do you have a consistent answer for why God has the qualities that he has. The best you can do is to say that God simply is what he is.
True.
But are consistent explanations necessary in order to think, feel or behave a certain way?
Not really.
They are actually synonymous when only two options are offered, and those offered are not practically acceptable.I think it's a false dichotomy, not necessarily a dilemma.
(Form Wiki: "A dilemma (Greek: δί-λημμα "double proposition") is a problem offering at least two possibilities, neither of which is practically acceptable."
The word "dilemma" is often wrongly used to mean 'dichotomy.')
To be clear, I'm not talking about a descriptive explanation rather one that lacks such details. Having said that I do have an answer through my belief but there's also logic behind my belief.
We may not need a descriptive explanation but we do require an explanation to prevent denial.