@Zinj --
well what im saying here is that the subconscious has more access to your brain than conscious when it comes to your "gut feeling".
Actually this is wrong, most likely. Our "subconscious" arises from the normal functioning of our pattern recognition and other mechanisms of our brain. The consciousness seems to be formed due to our brain's way of interpreting sensory data by building a model in that it seems to be including a model builder in the model. Your subconscious isn't "more aware" of anything, it just doesn't have to fit the data through as many filters as your conscious mind.
the gut feeling is one side of your brain thinking in a different light than the other and not relaying the message clearly enough for us to understand. the analytical side of your brain, the non gut feeling side, sees things for what they are. See it, touch it, etc. The gut feeling side of your brain sees it much differently, in an almost truer side.
Nope, both your subconscious and your conscious mind have exactly the same data to work with, the "lag" that most people seem to talk about is easily explained by the model building process that our brains use to interpret the data. You might smell gas, but until it's been filtered through the model your conscious mind won't know about it however the data that there is a gas leak is already in your head and your body is already responding accordingly. It has nothing to do with "seeing things differently" or one part of your mind "using more of your brain"(what with most of your brain matter being devoted to unconscious regulatory processes anyways, killing that whole "ten percent of the brain" bullshit), these positions arise from a lack of knowledge about how the body works(and thus are woo). As usual, a decent science education could clear up a lot of these misconceptions.
why is it felt if it hasn't happened?
It isn't, that's just illusion and coincidence. They're more than enough to account for this phenomenon.
because what if, outside the box time, we already know whats going to happen but don't get the memo on it.
I think that you need to look up what time is because I don't think that it is what
you think it is. Time arises due to entropy and our conception of time arises from the fact that our brains evolved in a world that routinely changed and they needed to be able to track and account for these changes.
Time isn't some absolute attribute of our universe, it(like space) is relative to the observer. Talk about some "time box" is pure, unadulterated, woo.
oh and anyone who brings god into a science chat should be shaken and not stirred.
1. I didn't "bring god into a science chat". I merely used the phrase to illustrate how you were wrong about your assertion that we knew we would fly one day. We didn't, and the overwhelming majority of humanity thought that it was completely impossible(and often killed those who didn't agree). Nowhere was anything about god brought into the current conversation, if you perhaps attempted to comprehend what you read you would have known that.
2. This is
hardly a science conversation. There are those of us who are trying to inject some science and rationality into it, but the main topic of discussion(and everything that
you've posted so far) is pseudoscientific woo-woo of the highest grade. The only way you could make it more potent is to mix other woos in with it(perhaps you could try quantum homeopathy woo next).
3. I do love the irony of harping on people for bringing unscientific shit into this while posting some of the most unadulterated woo I've seen in a while. Keep it up, you're giving me a laugh.
god didnt need to give us wings, we got brains instead. look where that went.
Now if only more people would use theirs we wouldn't be in the sorry state that we're in.