Amie--"Won't someone please think of the children?"
no one can make anyone believe anything without that person's consent.
Amie, I must respectfully disagree. My brother and I were raised Lutheran, and from the beginning my maternal grandmother and my aunt began supplying the "God is everything, man is nothing" that Emma Goldman laments in religions. Gaither records, books about God ... I grew up afraid of God because that's how it was taught me. True, they couldn't force me to continue believing that crap after I started studying the faith itself, and once I had better knowledge of the Bible, the children's propaganda books campaigning for God and Christ revealed themselves as lies.
It is as a result of this process, however, that I've come to "forgive" Christianity (see forgiveness thread for clarification on Tiassa and forgiveness) for its lies and deceptions. I see now that this is the way it must be among that church, for, like me, my aunt was indoctrinated to Christianity. It didn't take root in my mother, strangely. And before their generation you were allowed to teach the Bible to children in public schools and tell them it was historical and scientific fact.
So if you would like to say that "no one can make anyone believe anything without that person's consent", I would ask that you give some consideration to the indoctrination of children.
My daughter's grandparents--maternal--have sent us a satellite dish; it is designed to receive
only 3ABN, a Seventh-Day Adventist international television network. One of Tigger's aunts has sent a "church dress" for Emma Grace: pink and pleated and it has that white thing on the shoulders, and its cut to show her ass just like "cute" little dresses do ....
Apparently, we're supposed to start the indoctrination
now.
At any rate, the situation starts a trend that I would apply to your post:
-
We are each responsible for our own belief systems, people dont own our minds. we have choices when it comes to our beliefs. You know, I am acquainted with adults who still to this day fear God according to their indoctrination. As adults I hold them directly responsible for their choices, but I'm still not so sure they ever chose to be Christians inasmuch as they failed to choose not to.
-
I am a theist and I dont believe in hell. That's ... helpful. I mean, I'm a theist only because I finally came across a way of looking God I could accept.
-
there will always be *something* else to cause dissension Here's the thing: "Democrat or Republican" is an interesting choice because the results of that choice have vast implications for the
outcome of American society. "Christian, atheist, or otherwise" is an interesting choice with massive implications because it affects the
processes leading to the outcome. Where one might be persuaded logically on an economic position, such persuasion is doctrinally not possible in the religious arena.
But I agree, Q25's post
is asinine. It seems pretty much religious in its zealotry, and makes the serious mistake of basing opinions of religion on Christianity. Well and fine, but comparatively, I could look at that post and decide that humanity is asinine. Not a very good standard, eh?
But I've always noticed that it is in defense of Christianity that people assert choices; I would then ask every Christian household to please spare their children from the family religion until they are legal adults and can make that choice for themselves. In the meantime, indoctrination, extortion, and subversion do not result in a freely-given choice.
:m:,
Tiassa