Off-topic posts from the "Evidence that God is real" thread

[StrangerInAStrangeLand]

Once again, whatever fortitude you could muster has again evaporated and, once again, you've just retreated back to your soundbites. If you agree it requires two sincere parties, you have to now qualify how you make the grade.

///
Once again, you are evasively sidestepping the isssue.

<>

 

[Musika]

Nor might be the people who penned the bible.

Then, all things being equal, the legacy of redbull guzzling atheist slobs penning material for hate sites is all in the making.

 

[Musika]

///
Once again, you are evasively sidestepping the isssue.

<>

.... said the crab

 

[Write4U]

Assuming the parameters of the problem are determined by mere obedience, then yes.

The same holds true for religious beliefs. Obey or go to Hell!I
It is the fundamental problem of theist exclusivity in Religions. Nobody agrees on a definition of God and then they start fighting.....

 

[Musika]

The same holds true for religious beliefs. Obey or go to Hell!I
It is the fundamental problem of theist exclusivity in Religions. Nobody agrees on a definition of God and then they start fighting.....

Going to hell spells out a solution?
Kind of like saying constructing more juvenile detention centres is the means of assisting youth disenfranchised with contemporary culture.

 

[Write4U]

I have never maintained there was something specific about my authority on defining the subject (.... unlike certain contributors in threads such as these).

You think this feigned humility justifies your dismissal of anything that does not agree with your "non-authoritative" perspective?

 

[StrangerInAStrangeLand]

.... said the crab

///
It does not good at all to ask you a question or to make a point with you. This is not a discussion.

<>

 

[Write4U]

Going to hell spells out a solution?

Ask the religious people about that. They wrote the bible, not me.
I reject the notion of "eternal suffering" in Hell altogether. It's a religious concept.

 

[Musika]

You think this feigned humility justifies your dismissal of anything that does not agree with your non-authoritative perspective?

What is the authority here that determines perspective, and how have my views violated it?

 

[Musika]

///
It does not good at all to ask you a question or to make a point with you. This is not a discussion.

<>

For as long as you possess no fortitude and cannot go beyond offering quips, you own the stalemate.

 

[Musika]

Ask the religious people about that. They wrote the bible, not me.

You're the one talking about the parameters of a problem being dictated by obedience. Not me.

 

[StrangerInAStrangeLand]

For as long as you possess no fortitude and cannot go beyond offering quips, you own the stalemate.

///
You own the childish bullshit.

<>

 

[Musika]

///
You own the childish bullshit.

<>

Probably not a good moment to offer a quip to qualify your fortitude ....

 

[StrangerInAStrangeLand]

Probably not a good moment to offer a quip to qualify your fortitude ....

///
You can have the last meaningless word again.

<>

 

[Write4U]

///
Further evasive tactics.

<>

Well, crabs are notorius for walking sideways. Just can't keep a straight line....

 

[StrangerInAStrangeLand]

Ask the religious people about that. They wrote the bible, not me.
I reject the notion of "eternal suffering" in Hell altogether. It's a religious concept.

///
It is a stupid cruel religious concept. Anyone who accepts it is a cruel monster.

<>

 

[Musika]

///
You can have the last meaningless word again.

<>

Ok. Thanks.
I'm not sure why you think that would be a privilege.

 

[Write4U]

You're the one talking about the parameters of a problem being dictated by obedience. Not me.

No, the problem is the exclusive scriptural obedience demanded by religions. "Thou shalt have no false gods before thee", which really means that, in the absence of definition, every claimed God is false. Hence the fighting....

 

[StrangerInAStrangeLand]

Ok. Thanks.
I'm not sure why you think that would be a privilege.

//
Obviously, you need it.

 

[StrangerInAStrangeLand]

No, the problem is the exclusive scriptural obedience demanded by religions. "Thou shalt have no false gods before thee", which really means that, in the absence of definition, every claimed God is false. Hence the fighting....

///
Where does it say FALSE gods???

<>