Thats the same 65 million year fable the smithonian zombies, and eviloutionary darwinist's have been spouting for ages......LOL!!Laika said:The scar from the Chicxulub impact is still detectable after 65,000,000 years, and that didn't even affect the Earth's rotation or orbit (as far as I know). You claim that the crater has been obscured by flood-related erosion or deposition. I would ideally like to see some examples of such processes which can be dated to within 10,000 years of the present day.
Johan's Ark is a fifth of the size of Noah's and will carry farmyard animals.
Mr Huibers, who plans to open the vessel as a religious monument and zoo, hopes the project will renew interest in Christianity in the Netherlands.
Although Mr Huibers has tried to remain true to the ark described in the Bible, Johan's Ark is constructed with American cedar and Norwegian pine, rather than "gopher wood".
According to Genesis, Noah kept seven pairs of most domesticated animals, and one breeding pair of all other creatures.
Noah's wife, three sons and three daughters-in-law lived together on the boat for almost a year while the world was flooded.
Mr Huibers' vision is more modest - he said he plans to stock his ark with horses, lambs, chickens and rabbits - mostly baby animals to save space.
spuriousmonkey said:This would be interesting to see. It's only a fifth of the proper size and can't even hold the hold all the animals currently present in holland. Let alone a fifth of the species in the world.
TheVisitor said:Thats the same 65 million year fable the smithonian zombies, and eviloutionary darwinist's have been spouting for ages......LOL!!
You can't even prove there was an "asteriod" impact let alone that it was 65 million years ago...
The dinosaurs were not wiped off by an asteriod impact 65 million years ago.
They were alive and well untill many years after the flood.
It wasn't an asteriod impact that ended the age of dinosaurs and started little mammals working their way down the tree to humans living in caves.
Bones have been found yet unfossilized.... - and they find so-called extinct species alive and kicking every year.
There was no asteriod impact of that magnitude.
It was nuclear war....thats what they don't want you to know.
Thats what destroyed the earth, and it's mighty civilzations.....technology.
Leaning upon their own understanding without guidence from God.
So you go ahead and swallow their explanations "hook, line, and sinker" .....
Beleive that vomit and eat it on down for food, it you can stomach it.
Like I said, science is in itself a form of religion today.
spuriousmonkey said:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4853890.stm
Dutchman builds modern Noah's Ark
I'd imagine that most people posting on this forum do understand that. The fascinating thing is that some people do not, and they come up with quite bizarre ideas to support its literal interpretation.c7ityi_ said:dont you understand that the story is allegorical, like many other stories in the bible.
They have seeds.spuriousmonkey said:I just read a bit of the chapter on Noah's ark. I now have a question for the rigid believers amongst us.
I saw no mention of plants. Just creatures of flesh. How do you suppose plants survived a global flood.
spuriousmonkey said:Most seeds are rather vulnerable and certainly couldn't survive a year long submersion in water. Certainly not in salt water.
Where was the earth anyway? It was eroded away by the rain.
Laika said:Hey Woody, care to address the following?
If the flood was truly global, why was the erosion so localised?
How did Noah gather all the thousands (millions?) of species for salvation, given that even now new species are still being discovered?
Where are the sediments associated with the flood? I don't mean vegetation.
I mean all clastic sediment from boulders to clay.
How did human and animal remains which pre-date the flood survive undisturbed in coastal caves?
How is it that unique ecosystems survived in lakes if they were all immersed?