and you cannot "convert" the faithful with logic
Don't I know it.
and you cannot "convert" the faithful with logic
anti freeze said:1. why no freewill? if you put a rat in a maze, you control where the rat can go. no matter if the rat decides to turn left or right at point B or point C, eventually, that rat will end up at the end of the maze. the maze is god's plan, you are the rat [no offense], and "freewill" is your ability to make choices as you proceed through the maze.
but where is the choice if the route is preordained, do talk sense.antifreeze said:1. why no freewill? if you put a rat in a maze, you control where the rat can go. no matter if the rat decides to turn left or right at point B or point C, eventually, that rat will end up at the end of the maze. the maze is god's plan, you are the rat [no offense], and "freewill" is your ability to make choices as you proceed through the maze.
I/we dont question non-existence, that just stupid, but we can question what the bible says of a god, and god is evil as he brought evil into the world.antifreeze said:2. you cannot call god evil. god is the fountainhead of morals, who are you to question "Him"?
nobody wishes to convert you , it take's years to treat the mentally ill, and sometimes to no avail.antifreeze said:3. finally, and most importantly, religion is based on faith, and you cannot "convert" the faithful with logic. but...live and learn. at the least, i admire your quest.
But you also said that Jesus was irrelevant, which from his teachings Christians get there concept from God from. Therefore, you cannot use the God the Christians preach for your conclusions.superluminal said:Look. I set the premise that god exists as stated by christians and went from there.
If you are judging the Christian God you will also have to consider that He provided a way for you to return to Him, and you have chosen not to.superluminal said:The premise was: If god exists and is omniscient and omnipotent then he knows I'm an atheist and why and still will burn me in hell therefore god (assuming he exists with attributes as stated) is completely, utterly evil.
But declaring your bad logic and not supporting it does matter. Have fun.superluminal said:I'm tired of this anyway. I know there's no god(s) so it dosen't matter. Have fun.
as I've read thought this thread, I do believe the the xian god was refered to as evil or non existent therefore jesus if he existed must be irrelevant.SVRP said:But you also said that Jesus was irrelevant, which from his teachings Christians get there concept from God from.
why not he was the one out of thousands, that was refered to.SVRP said:Therefore, you cannot use the God the Christians preach for your conclusions.
no, a god does not exist, it's judging the xian concept of a god.SVRP said:If you are judging the Christian God
why, it does not exist the would be foolish.SVRP said:you will also have to consider that He provided a way for you to return to Him, and you have chosen not to.
why not it the one thats been refered to.SVRP said:But if you still consider Jesus as irrelevant, then you are not talking about the Christian God.
which is what is been done.SVRP said:You will then have to determine the character of the god you are referring to
it cant have actions it does not exist. wtf are you talking about.SVRP said:before you presume his actions regarding the knowledge of your atheism.
why, there is no hell, it cant send anybody anywhere it does not exist.SVRP said:Then you will have to provide an argument for an existence of hell before determining this is where this god is sending you to.
what bad logic elaborate.SVRP said:But declaring your bad logic
The one you have just exhibited, pavlosmarcos.pavlosmarcos said:what bad logic elaborate.
The "premise" was not supported by your statements, superluminal, therefore your conclusion is faulty.superluminal said:Do you know what a "premise" is? And what it implies for an argument? No? Too bad.
I would like to see you elborate it too please.SVRP said:The one you have just exhibited, pavlosmarcos.