first off lucifers angel, i would like to say congratulations. That was a good thing you did for your child and it must have been hard....
Agreed!:bravo: VERY admirable!
Hmmm, I wonder how I can get my husband knocked up.
first off lucifers angel, i would like to say congratulations. That was a good thing you did for your child and it must have been hard....
Sandy said:
Not so. Born-again Christians know the only way to Heaven is by "accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior". It has nothing to do with works/good deeds/charity. It's all about Him.
Not so. Born-again Christians know the only way to Heaven is by "accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior". It has nothing to do with works/good deeds/charity. It's all about Him.
first off lucifers angel, i would like to say congratulations. That was a good thing you did for your child and it must have been hard.
But you are living in a fary tale if you think that adictions are that easy to break.
Nicotinee: i have tried quiting 5 times even WITH the patches
Acholisum: You have no idea what your talking about. I know an acholic (well i know 2 if you include my grandfather but he is dead) and she STILL isnt "Recovered" 10 years after her last drink. If it was that easy to cure why cant she have a drink? because that would start off the adiction again. Your an idiot, there is no such thing as a cure for adiction, just an adict who isnt using
Not so. Born-again Christians know the only way to Heaven is by "accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior". It has nothing to do with works/good deeds/charity. It's all about Him.
This is a place of science and you have just made a very serious assertion. You are requested to immediately provide the evidence for that assertion. Goddess knows I'm hardly Sandy's biggest fan but I find myself constantly having to spring to her defense because people keep derailing threads in order to rag on her. And that, dear friends is trolling!How can the sock puppet thing be off topic, when I am convinced 'Sandy' is a sock puppet?
This thread deals with a very emotionally charged issue and people have expressed points of view that are based on emotion rather than reason. Sandy cannot be denied the right to do likewise. If her emotionally-based opinions annoy any of you then you should stop creating threads that encourage emotionally-based opinions. Just because your own emotionally-based opinions all conform to the majority demographic of SciForums doesn't make them any more rational.Every post is inflammatory, and 'Sandy' knows the reaction it will receive. That is the very definition of trolling. . . .
Plenty of trolling is done by members in bare feet. I have seen no evidence that Sandy is a sock puppet and in fact I'm convinced that she is pretty close to who she says she is--as close as any of us are in this virtual, anonymous community. If you have such evidence, please present it. Otherwise, according to the scientific method, you may not pursue this line of argument any further. On this thread or any other!. . . . and trolling is most often done by sock puppets, so they can later reveal how clever they were at fooling us.
Phlogistician said:
How can the sock puppet thing be off topic, when I am convinced 'Sandy' is a sock puppet?
This is a place of science and you have just made a very serious assertion.
You are requested to immediately provide the evidence for that assertion.
This thread deals with a very emotionally charged issue
Phogistician said:
I personally am convinced, and I have asked 'Sandy' if it's time to claim her prize. Note how she has not denied she is a sock puppet, she just avoids the thread ....
.... Assertion? Saying I am convinced, and asking 'Sandy' if it's time to come clean? OK, so the second time I said it, I wasn't asking so much, but if you read the thread, it's all in context, and 'Sandy' has not denied she is a sock puppet.