News From Gaza
- Thread starter S.A.M.
- Start date
- Status
too bas there is nothing left of suicide bombers to reward them. but they make lovely portfolio for kids.
too bas there is nothing left of suicide bombers to reward them. but they make lovely portfolio for kids.
it is a well known fact that desperate oppressed people will use suicide tactics
so why jews in WWii didnt use them?
they had the banks doing the suicides for them.
hu?
the Jewish controlled banks acting as suicides...economical destabilizers
...
are you ranting about your mythical ides of WW2 again
not all of them do but almost all suicide attacks come from desperate oppressed peoples. usualy easterners for some reason.
Probably cos martyrdom is associated with warriors in the East. Which is why the heroes in the movies always give their lives for other people. Also like hara-kiri. The Jews were the first to commit mass suicide under the Romans. Also the first terrorists (the Sicarii, or the Zealots)
you didnt answer my question. if that is true then they should have being super duper suicide bombers as they faced extermination.
not really it takes time for shit to reach critical point. plus there isn't the streak of sacrifice for the whole in the jewish mentality that tends to be a trigger.
Bells
Staff member
Most probably because they did not know they were facing extermination.
That is an interesting question Spock. Do you have an answer?
It certainly was not a lack of courage or willingness to die if they could take a few Nazis with them, at least not near end of the war when all knew what Hilter was doing to solve the "Jewish problem."
For example in the Warsaw getho up rising there were about 10 men for every gun they had at the start. They charged some German sand-bag circles with machine guns that were at major street intersection in a single file line with the gun held by the lead man. When he was killed, the numer two man got the gun to advance a few meters more. That and timing the first attacks well (Germans sleeping - not expecting any such craziness from the "sub-human Jewish scum") allowed them to capture machine guns, small arms, and even three tanks. Better armed, they held large part of the city for about a month, Expecting the Soviet army, which was then just on the other side of river (I forget its name) east of Warsaw to cross and re-inforce them.
Stalin did not want the Jews (or other Poles) to liberate Warsaw and have any post war claim to power. (He had other plans for Poland.) So, he forbid any of the troops to cross the river. After about two weeks of waiting for the order to cross, some Jews serving in the Soviet Army ceased two boats and began to cross, disobeying the order to stand pat on the East bank of the river. They did not make it across. The soviet artillery sank their stolen boats.
I know of no greater exhibiton of premeditated actions requiring organized courage by hundereds willing to die, knowing most would, than how the Warsaw Jews got the weapons to hold about half of Warsaw for a month. (The Warsaw resistance was not all Jews - Doubt if anyone knows what fraction were, but I bet at least half were.) Hitler was so outraged by this, that he actually pulled troops from the Western front to teach the occupied lands a lesson by destroying Warsaw. (Although the resistance failed, it was not without effect on the war.) The US and or English wanted to air-drop weapons and other supplies, but the round trip was too far, so they repeatedly during that month asked for permission from "ally" Stain to land in territory under Soviet control and refuel for the return trip. Stalin refused - he had other plans for Poland.
Again, It is a good question. Do you have an answer?
Last edited by a moderator:
the warsaw ghetto uprising and the warsaw uprising are 2 different events i believe the ghetto uprising was just jewish people and happened in 42 or 43 in 44 the entire city rebelled and from what i read the remaining members of the ghetto were some of the most couragous troops during that.
Yes -that is correct. The resistance I spoke of probably should not have been called an "up-rising" especially not with mention of the Jewish ghetto, as that does cause confusion. I did mention that among the Polish Patriots who attacked machine gun nest with only one gun and thrown rocks, Molletoff cocktails, etc were many non-Jews. However, I think their central command and planning was dominated by Jews of the ghetto - they knew they would be killed, unless he war ended soon - so better to die trying.
What kind of a question is that to ask someone? Does it make a difference to the actual points people cite? Are you asked if you're a Palestinian suicide bomber or Al Jazeera reporter every time you challenge a pro-Israeli viewpoint? Tchup could be from Venus for all it matters. Have some respect and decency!
- Status