In a small shop by their rocketed, bullet-pocked apartment building, the Abed Rabo family argued raucously about the impact of the 48-hour Israeli military incursion, which killed nearly 100 Palestinians, including some neighbors.
“We all support resistance to the Israelis,” said Hitam Abed Rabo, 33, a lawyer with the military court set up by Hamas, which she supports. “They talk about responding to rockets, but nothing justifies what the Israelis did here. They have to be confronted with strong resistance, so they don’t come back.”
Will firing rockets on Israeli towns bring independence and freedom? “Yes,” she said. “Absolutely.”
Ayash Abed Rabo, 34, her cousin, scoffed. “These rockets are a joke,” he said. “We want to live. We want peace. I don’t want Israel here, and I don’t want resistance.”
Israeli officials say the operation was meant to show Hamas — the militant Islamist group in power here, which opposes peace with Israel — the cost of continuing to fire rockets, especially the longer range ones, and to try to create further popular dissatisfaction with Hamas. Arguments persist over how many of the dead were truly uninvolved civilians, with Palestinian officials saying half or more than half, and Israel saying far less than half.
But the residents here were horrified by the numbers of civilians they believed had died, and even officials here of Fatah — the more secular Palestinian party negotiating with Israel — think the popular reaction has served to strengthen Hamas by turning it into the victim, at least in the short term.
The Palestinian education ministry issued a report on Thursday stating that 22 Palestinian students were killed in the latest Israeli attacks on the Palestinian coastal region.
The report, which covers the period between the 27th of February to the 3rd of March also shows that 20 students were injured in those attacks.
The report also said that during the Israeli ground offensive targeting the northern part of the Gaza strip last week the Israeli tanks partially destroyed two schools.
When attacked, it is preferrable to respond with overwhelming force.
Such a terribly... limited... list.chuuush: 'I suppose time has really come for the Palestinian people to remind the world that "You are either with us or against us!" '
The Marquis: "Remind, as if such an ultimatum was a fact at some point?"
It's a pervasive tactic. "With us or against us" is constantly employed by the government, major media, militarists, the Christian far-right, and pro-zionists in the USA.
Do you also accept this for Palestinians under occupation?
It's the preferable strategy for anyone. However, the Arab nations tried this and failed. Now the terrorists just lob an occasional rocket at Israel, which does nothing but provoke retaliation, which is the purpose, so they can claim victimhood and pursuade the gullible.
youre from Russia? thats explains why you are a jew hater.
joy in gaza:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3516031,00.html
Translating to the other POV:... the terrorists just lob an occasional rocket at Israel, which does nothing but provoke retaliation, which is the purpose, so they can claim victimhood and pursuade the gullible.
As Israel pursues its "holocaust" in Gaza, America deploys a destroyer off Lebanon, Iranian President Ahmadinejad makes a historic trip to Iraq and the Arab cold war grows colder, should the region be bracing itself for the worst