redarmy11 said:Have you met Woody?
Genji said:Even though I have poor Woody on ignore I still see his quotes! That sex talk from him is gonna make me puke!! I picture Jim Bakker and a fat wife making stains on their burlap bed in the barn. Pukebucket PLEASE!!!!! I need a shower after reading that. *gag*
Oh no. I just prefer a beefy, tan 20something construction worker to slurp on for hours on end. That's all The more sweat the better!!Giambattista said:You're probably puking because, being a sodomite, you're naturally appalled by that which God has declared good, whilst wallowing in filth and eating excrement, and getting AIDS, and molesting children, and trying to undermine marriage, etc...
madanthonywayne said:No. His bit was in response to news reports of homosexual necrophilia. I believe it was some guys who worked at a morgue. So any linkage of homosexuality with other unsavory activities was in the minds of the morgue workers.
Genji said:The more sweat the better!!
Woody said:They are ALL compulsive bigoted liars. They'll stoop to any level in order to get their way because they're bigots with no morality.
Bebelina said:According to the poll, we have at least 3 pedophiles at sciforums. I hope you suffer, suffer and suffer, are tortured by yourselves and then die a horrible death and go to hell ( which in your case will be manifested as being thos children and animals you have molested)!!!
Why does Nambla exist? Why is this organisation allowed to exist?
And the Purity Pograms Begin!!!! NAMBLA is repulsive no doubt, but thought crimes are not yet punishable by law, nor do I think thought crimes Should be illegal. If a NAMBLA member acts out then he should be imprisoned. THINKING about illegal activity is freedom of speech.Bebelina said:According to the poll, we have at least 3 pedophiles at sciforums. I hope you suffer, suffer and suffer, are tortured by yourselves and then die a horrible death and go to hell ( which in your case will be manifested as being thos children and animals you have molested)!!!
Why does Nambla exist? Why is this organisation allowed to exist?
Some people SHOULD cover their stench but if a guy is healthy and has a good diet I prefer the real sweat smell over some tangy, alcohol smelling Lysol smeared under the arms.Giambattista said:Sweat is a natural cologne, in my opinion. I don't know why people (especially in America, I'm assuming) are so anal about covering up their scent.
They are a tiny insignificant little wart on the face of a country with bleeding wounds. Sure they are ugly, but a mere blemish in comparison to the real problems sinking this country. (The US at least.) They are routinely infiltrated, baited by local news stations looking for ratings and so out of orbit with reality that only anti-gay activists and churches bring them into the news. Many groups advcate legalizing marijuana. They even have lobbyists! Pit bulls, George Bush and influenza are far more of a threat to kids in the US than a freaky little club of men that admire youth.Bebelina said:Genji, so you THINK all they do is talk. That is wishful thinking if any. They have a purpose for this organisation, they want to make raping children legal, so that they don't have to go to jail. They are not only THINKING...
Theoryofrelativity said:No, it doesn't take 5yrs of marriage to have the good stuff. Marriage is no guarrantee of good sex.
Giambattista said:ALL is a strong word. Do you have evidence to back up the assertion that ALL homosexual persons are compulsive, bigoted, liars??? Did the WHO do a study on the prevalence of dishonesty and homosexuality? Do you have a graph for that?
Bebelina said:Genji, so you THINK all they do is talk. That is wishful thinking if any.
Given what you said I would say 16 was a very resonable age. I wouldn't find anything under 16 attractive anyway just for the fact that said object will not shut the fuck up giggling.Theoryofrelativity said:I like the 16yr age law.
.
Genji said:Even though I have poor Woody on ignore I still see his quotes! That sex talk from him is gonna make me puke!! I picture Jim Bakker and a fat wife making stains on their burlap bed in the barn. Pukebucket PLEASE!!!!! I need a shower after reading that. *gag*
imaplanck. said:Given what you said I would say 16 was a very resonable age. I wouldn't find anything under 16 attractive anyway just for the fact that said object will not shut the fuck up giggling.
Woody said:All of them I've met here at sciforums are that way.
Woody said:I had many unpleasant experiences with homos right here on sciforums. This is where I actually HEAR what they have to say and it SUCKS. They are ALL compulsive bigoted liars.