NAMBLA Poll

Which Sexual Behaviors are Morally Appropriate? (check all that apply)


  • Total voters
    26
Status
Not open for further replies.
Genji said:
George Bush and influenza are far more of a threat to kids in the US than a freaky little club of men that admire youth.
How old was the guy who popped your butt cherry?
 
Giambattista said:
Oh, so I'm supposed to believe that your comment was meant ONLY for homosexuals here on sciforums.com???

Yep, that's what I said. I already told you about the ones at exgay forums that are as NICE as ANYONE you'd ever want to meet. You've got a commucation problem, dude. You only listen to what YOU want to hear,and it's pretty annoying. It's obvious that you have some kind of agenda.

Here's another excerpt from the exact same post that you have so liberally abused.

I am also participating on an EX-GAY forum, so I can understand. The EX-GAYS are such nice people. I'm sorry they have same-sex attraction. The BIG difference is ATTITUDE. They changed theirs, and now they are interested in the OPPOSITE SEX. They're over there laughing about the IMMUTABILITY of sexual orientation. It is a joke, just like the APA. The American Psychiatric Association says pedophilia is just fine. Well yeah, I guess it is if yer a pedophile.
 
redarmy11 said:
Woody.

There's no such thing as an ex-gay. They're just pretending. Honest. They are.

How are you so sure?

The one's at ex-gay forums are laughing about the so called fact that "they can't change."

Admittedly the success rate for "total reorientation" where even same sex fantasies dissapear is somewhere between 23% and 27% depending on whose data you go by.

First of all they have to want to change before there is any hope that they can change.

Secondly there are a lot of people that write-off the natural human ability to adapt. It's an adaptation changing from homo to hetero. It could probably work the other way around too, but nobody wants to go in that direction: hetero to homo.
 
Last edited:
Woody said:
How are you so sure?

The one's at ex-gay forums are laughing about the so called fact that "they can't change."

Woody are you struggling with gay feelings? You do seem somewhat over preoccupied with gay men, making your way to their forums. How bizarre?

I think you come here to purge yourself of what you see as dirty feelings and think that by being angry at other gays you can somehow purge yourself and remove the guilt of your own gay thoughts.
 
redarmy11 said:
Of course they are. They can't even admit the truth to themselves - not when God is watching.

In other words you don't believe they are honest with themselves when they are happily married to the opposite sex and wouldn't have it any other way.

Homosexuality is largely a BEHAVIOR that depends on ENVIRONMENT. Example: Is it any surprise that homosexual behavior INCREASES in prison where all people are the same sex? Prision is an environment.
 
Woody said:
In other words you don't believe they are honest with themselves when they are happily married to the opposite sex and wouldn't have it any other way.


If that was true, they wouldn't be seeking out other 'alleged' exgay men to chat to on the internet, wake up Woody!
 
Theoryofrelativity said:
If that was true, they wouldn't be seeking out other 'alleged' exgay men to chat to on the internet, wake up Woody!

Oh give me a break, You know nothing of this. There are as many women there as there are men. I talk more with the ex-lesbians. They have an ex-gay dating network too --opposite sex of course.
 
Woody said:
In other words you don't believe they are honest with themselves when they are happily married to the opposite sex and wouldn't have it any other way.
No I don't. I don't see why someone who previously exhibited homosexual tendencies and engaged in homosexual behaviour should suddenly stop doing this and feel no further compulsion to do so. I think 'ex-gays' are people who, for one reason or another, feel it necessary to repress their homosexual impulses - either because it's inconsistent with their religious beliefs of for another reason which causes them undue stress.
 
Woody said:
What about their personality? Would you want to work for someone that is a sado-masochist? How would you like them for a boss or a co-worker?

Let's say you needed marriage or family counseling, Would you go to your local sado-masochist? :eek:
Sure. I don't see why not.
 
Theoryofrelativity said:
Woody are you struggling with gay feelings? You do seem somewhat over preoccupied with gay men, making your way to their forums. How bizarre?

I think you come here to purge yourself of what you see as dirty feelings and think that by being angry at other gays you can somehow purge yourself and remove the guilt of your own gay thoughts.

Yup, he doth protest too much
 
Woody said:
Yep, that's what I said. I already told you about the ones at exgay forums that are as NICE as ANYONE you'd ever want to meet. You've got a commucation problem, dude.
Dude? Is that "straight" speak you're making there???
Tis you who's got the communication problem, dude.

I had many unpleasant experiences with homos right here on sciforums. This is where I actually HEAR what they have to say and it SUCKS.

The "they" in your accusation there does not pertain merely to "homos" on sciforums. You already specified in the former sentence who the "they" (in the second sentence) is that you are "actually" HEARING. The whole structure of those two sentences is completely misworded, if that's what you were getting at. The "they" that you refer to is "homos" in general. If you had meant merely "homos on sciforums" then you never would have had to mention "homos" in general in the first sentence. Instead, you would have said simply, 'I hear what "homos on sciforums" have to say, and it SUCKS.'

Am I the only one here who is so observant to see the grammatical errors Woody has made if he were in fact only speaking of "homos" on sciforums?


Woody said:
You only listen to what YOU want to hear,and it's pretty annoying. It's obvious that you have some kind of agenda.

Were you looking deep into a mirror when you wrote that?

Woody said:
Here's another excerpt from the exact same post that you have so liberally abused.

I am also participating on an EX-GAY forum, so I can understand. The EX-GAYS are such nice people. I'm sorry they have same-sex attraction. The BIG difference is ATTITUDE. They changed theirs, and now they are interested in the OPPOSITE SEX. They're over there laughing about the IMMUTABILITY of sexual orientation. It is a joke, just like the APA. The American Psychiatric Association says pedophilia is just fine. Well yeah, I guess it is if yer a pedophile.

When did I ever deny that people can change their orientation? What has this whole paragraph above got to do with me? Did I ever deny that people may be unhappy with their attractions, and that they may seek to change them, and that they may actually find the change they're looking for?

No.
 
Woody said:
Oh give me a break, You know nothing of this. There are as many women there as there are men. I talk more with the ex-lesbians. They have an ex-gay dating network too --opposite sex of course.

And why is that? That you talk with "ex" lesbians more? Are you posing as a prospective suitor, for your own ends?
 
Woody said:
Secondly there are a lot of people that write-off the natural human ability to adapt. It's an adaptation changing from homo to hetero. It could probably work the other way around too, but nobody wants to go in that direction: hetero to homo.

I have heard that it happens, from time to time.
 
Woody said:
Here's another excerpt from the exact same post that you have so liberally abused.

This liberal abuse you speak of is mostly of your own vain imagining.
 
red army said:
No I don't. I don't see why someone who previously exhibited homosexual tendencies and engaged in homosexual behaviour should suddenly stop doing this and feel no further compulsion to do so.

It's simple RA. Just look at about anybody that gets out of prison. It's common in prison, but when the opposite sex is around they don't need it (gay sex) anymore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top