NAMBLA Poll
- Thread starter Woody
- Start date
- Status
As for NAMBLA; Of course I don't condone sex with with minors. That should remain illegal, but a person or group talking about it or talking/advocating legalizing it is a right of free speech. If a member engages in pedophilia he should be arrested. If he speaks about it he has as much right to say it as neo-Nazis, Klansmen, the Phelps church and religious fundamentalists do with their freak-speech.
Genji said:
I don't agree with free speech, some people should well and truly have their mouths sewn up, and fed through a tube in their bellies.
I have to partially agree. Nothing would please me more than opening fire on Christian fundies or Klanners at a rally but thought crimes are not crimes. How can they be? If a NAMBLA person thinks about sex with boys he has not broken the law. Advocating legalizing marijuana could be considered a thought crime. THINKING about murder but never committing one is not a crime. Opening the gates to full prosecution of thought crimes is a dangerous and slippery slope. Certainly more of a threat to the population than a lone, drooling NAMBLA member lusting for a boy.Theoryofrelativity said:
Genji said:
Thought is a crime when it is used to manipulate the masses into 'action' which it is.
Where is my needle and thread?
Nothing would please you more than opening fire on Christian fundies?Genji said:
Butt "a lone, drooling NAMBLA member lusting for a boy" is not a big deal to you.
Reading your statement shows your easy acceptance of "man boy love".
How old was the dude that popped your corn?
Genji said:
Why should it remain illegal? NAMBLA is one YOURS dude.
from the WIKI:
I thought you were for sexual freedom for all.
That's freedom ain't it? Some boy wants a man for a sex partner, and they both enjoy it. IF it's ok to be gay then what's wrong with that. They both consent.
Both grew off the same tree.
If you're going to abolish morals, might as well do it right!
Equality without equal.
OK so the decision to "dump" your pedo-fag friends wasn't based on morals. No surprises here.
Oh well, you gotta be a grown up to be gay, boys.
Political baggage as it were, NAMBLA got left out.
Sounds like a good argument to me -- NAMBLA is just as gay as anybody.
The politics of self-indulgence -- well said by a gay-rights activist.
Last edited:
You are making gross errors of assumption while making your comparisons wood.
You are making the assumption that a percentage(no matter how small that percentage) of pre-pubescent boys want to come home from school and have a fully grown man bugger them, you are making the assumption that 1 in 100/ 1 in 1000 or even 1 in 1000000 pre-pubescent boys fantasize about having a fully grown man for a lover, you woody are making the assumption that children(equally to adults) are capable of resisting coercion and bribery(be it material or emotional)
You are making the assumption that a percentage(no matter how small that percentage) of pre-pubescent boys want to come home from school and have a fully grown man bugger them, you are making the assumption that 1 in 100/ 1 in 1000 or even 1 in 1000000 pre-pubescent boys fantasize about having a fully grown man for a lover, you woody are making the assumption that children(equally to adults) are capable of resisting coercion and bribery(be it material or emotional)
Last edited:
imaplanck. said:
The point I'm making is this: What is the basis for morality? What if a kid wants sex with another kid?
According to the research I've read, a sizeable per centage of homosexuals had their first "experience" before puberty. That's what the abolishment of the age-of-consent laws was originally about -- allowing kids to have sex with kids (or adults if NAMBLA had their way). I suggest you read the literature, and answer the question: Is it ok for a child to have sex with another child if they both consent to it?
Where do you draw the line on morality?
By the way, "the" Mohammed married an nine year old girl. Doesn't that make him a pedophile?
From the source:
Mohammed was also a polygamist -- he had 12 wives altogether.
I'm perfectly entititled to call Mohammed a pedophile, How am I mistaken in that assessment? If some guy marries a nine year old girl, and then has sex with her, he goes to jail.
Last edited:
You draw the line when an adult participates in a pre-pubescents first sexual act, thats where I draw the line in my moral assessment.Woody said:
Reread what I said, but this time in the understanding of it's meant context (in rebuttal of woods last post).D'ster said:
Has anyone heard Sam Kinnison's bit on homosexual necrophilia? Hillarious.q0101 said:
Is this not just an attempt to link homosexual attraction with other attractions or activities deemed unsavory?
No. His bit was in response to news reports of homosexual necrophilia. I believe it was some guys who worked at a morgue. So any linkage of homosexuality with other unsavory activities was in the minds of the morgue workers.Giambattista said:
- Status