Moses the Jewish leader

[arauca]

How can be proved that Moses existed ?

 

[spidergoat]

It cannot be proven.

 

[kx000]

http://fightthegoodfightjeremy.blogspot.com/2008/02/so-much-for-those-who-try-to-explain.html

We have a route, and evidence from human and horse remains, and a wheel presumably from a chariot.

identical to the first, except on this one the inscription was still intact! In Phoenician letters (Archaic Hebrew), it contained the words: Mizraim (Egypt ); Solomon; Edom; death; Pharaoh; Moses; and Yahweh,

 

[spidergoat]

Right, one wheel proves an entire army drowned there. And where are all the artifacts in the desert crossing?

 

[wlminex]

. . . ALL I know is that it says in the Bible . . . "Moses tied his ass to a tree and then walked 40 miles into the wilderness" Tee Hee!

 

[arauca]

It cannot be proven.

The fact that there are Jews and their tradition could that not be acceptable ?

 

[kx000]

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/joseph.htm

 

[Arioch]

@arauca --

Argumentum ad populum. Fallacy. Please try again.

@Knowledge --

You know, I looked into that link you gave. I went looking for their sources, which they oddly haven't cited, and I couldn't find anything even remotely matching their claims in the peer review literature. Basically they just pulled all of that stuff right out of their asses.

 

[Dywyddyr]

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/joseph.htm

Ron Wyatt was a crank of the first order.
His widow is hardly less so.

 

[arauca]

@arauca --

Argumentum ad populum. Fallacy. Please try again.

@Knowledge --

You know, I looked into that link you gave. I went looking for their sources, which they oddly haven't cited, and I couldn't find anything even remotely matching their claims in the peer review literature. Basically they just pulled all of that stuff right out of their asses.

Speak clear don't try to impress me with your Latin words,

 

[kx000]

Ron Wyatt was a crank of the first order.
His widow is hardly less so.

Crank -An eccentric person, esp. one obsessed by a particular subject or theory.

Ok, and?

 

[Dywyddyr]

Crank -An eccentric person, esp. one obsessed by a particular subject or theory.

Ok, and?

SO
A) he doesn't know what he's talking about.
B) his "theories" don't hold up
C) he has no evidence
D) he invents "facts" when he can't find them

In short he's not only wrong he's worse than wrong.

 

[arauca]

Ron Wyatt was a crank of the first order.
His widow is hardly less so.

So what have that to do ? You seams not liking some finding

 

[arauca]

SO
A) he doesn't know what he's talking about.
B) his "theories" don't hold up
C) he has no evidence
D) he invents "facts" when he can't find them

Can you elaborate on the subject , were" he does not know what he is talking about "

 

[Dywyddyr]

So what have that to do ?

Pardon?
The link given was written by Mary Nell Wyatt, based on Ron Wyatt's "work". It's not reliable. It's pseudo-scholarship.

You seams not liking some finding

In English please.
There is no "finding". The guy was a crank and prepared to twist data to suit his preconceptions.

Can you elaborate on the subject , were" he does not know what he is talking about

For a start you could check the Wiki page.
Read the links given.

 

[Ellie]

Right, one wheel proves an entire army drowned there. And where are all the artifacts in the desert crossing?

What would you expect to find after thousands of years?

 

[786]

How do you prove your, great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandfather -whatever-his-name-was- existed (not you, but actual historical evidence of his person )

 

[Arioch]

@arauca --

It's an argument from popularity. The language it's said in is irrelevant, though I would have thought that someone debating a philosophical concept on a science site would know the basics of logic.

 

[arauca]

@arauca --

It's an argument from popularity. The language it's said in is irrelevant, though I would have thought that someone debating a philosophical concept on a science site would know the basics of logic.

You are continuing exalting yourself.

 

[Dywyddyr]

You are continuing exalting yourself.

Incorrect.
He's simply noting that YOU are, apparently, incapable of understanding logic.