Buffalo Roam
Registered Senior Member
proof
Lack of a loud boom, and news coverage of the event.
proof
Lack of a loud boom, and news coverage of the event.
The Rich Are Getting Richer Faster, Much Faster:
The increase in incomes of the top 1% of Americans from 2003 to 2005 exceeded the total income of the poorest 20% of Americans.
The poorest fifth of households had total income of $383.4 billion in 2005, while just the increase in income for the top 1% came to $524.8 billion, a figure 37% higher....
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/15/b...s6PT1FH6bNDNmF9mThcWg&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
FallacyLack of a loud boom, and news coverage of the event.
You are correct, but in the long run, it is cause for crying, (by all) not rejoycing (even by the already rich).The Rich Are Getting Richer Faster, Much Faster:
The increase in incomes of the top 1% of Americans from 2003 to 2005 exceeded the total income of the poorest 20% of Americans. ...
thats not good news
If someday sandy disappears forever, we know what happened........
um the lower and middle classes pay a higher percentage of the total income tax revenue than the wealthy
proof
There is something strange in Sandy's logic (not the first time) about "W" preventing 9/11s. Why not give credit to Clinton? During Clinton's administration there were no 9/11s. In fact, it is only during W's administration that the US has suffered a 9/11.
No, the attackers were not even chosen when Clinton was in office. They got all their flight training in the US while GWB's was in office and cutting taxes for the rich, not taking care of US security. Give GWB the credit he is do - I do that....The attacks take years to prepare. 911 was almost ready to happen when W took office. ...
No, the attackers were not even chosen when Clinton was in office. They got all their flight training in the US while GWB's was in office and cutting taxes for the rich, not taking care of US security. Give GWB the credit he is do - I do that.
every single event in the was shown to be bogus later.
Yes. It will mean I've been raptured. :worship:
With your behaviour and complete disregard for the poor? I don't think so... :bugeye:Yes. It will mean I've been raptured. :worship:
Nope. Raise your arms out like Jesus on the cross, start talking in tongues, and the gunman will freak out and run.
You're right. It's GREAT news!
Yes. It will mean I've been raptured. :worship:
Wrong. Buffalo's quote is correct.
You're still alive.
The attacks take years to prepare. 911 was almost ready to happen when W took office. binLaden had it made under Clinton who didn't care about anything except his d!ck.
They were talked about even earlier; but until their plans were more definite there was no "actionable information."...The operation for 9/11 were in set motion on the 2nd of November, 1997, which means that the planning was going on even before that.
Agent Wright would later tell ABC's Brian Ross: "September 11th is a direct result of the incompetence of the FBI's International Terrorism Unit,"
I an not a lawyer, but I would assume that bring money into the US to finace some thing like 9/11 is a crime, even before 9/11 occurs or at least "grounds for investigation" as some FBI agents, including Robert Wright, wanted to do but were prevented from doing because of orders from higher up during early days of GWB's administration.The agent is wrong. FBI is designed to investigate a criminal case where an event has already occured including Terrorism. FBI is not designed or was ever designed to prevent such activities. ...
I an not a lawyer, but I would assume that bring money into the US to finace some thing like 9/11 is a crime, even before 9/11 occurs or at least "grounds for investigation" as some FBI agents, including Robert Wright, wanted to do but were prevented from doing because of orders from higher up during early days of GWB's administration.