The material isn't stiff enough to force the corner back down.Have you heard of strength of materials? You don't think the attractive forces within the jacket might tend to resist movement? No, obviously you don't think so. As a consequence I am forced to ask are you stupid, or just poorly educated? Take your time to answer.
What do you think of those other three explanations? HeadLikeARock is a regular poster at the Clavius forum.Look on pages three and four of the comment section of this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_CMgqitv98
Three different pro-Apollo people have given three different explanations for the swinging jacket corner.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Wrong! The jacket is tied at the back. When his body goes down, so does the back of the jacket. Which is attached to the front corner of the jacket. Simple."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Its obviously a result of destructive interference in the oscillating longitudinal waves created by Collins zero-g movement."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In zero-g, the corner will return to rest in the same position as related to its position in the rest of the jacket, regardless of orientation. This is not a diffucult concept. Ciao !
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The first two are very well-known pro-Apollo people.
This is who HeadLikeARock is.
http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/in...7&page=1#33457
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/in...ndpost&p=98465
This is who SpreadingtheMuse is.
http://es.youtube.com/user/SpreadingtheMuse
The third is an unknown.
If you read pages 3 and 4 of the comment section, you'll see that SpreadingtheMuse has said that all three are correct. You'll also see that the person who made the video (svector) has been ignoring requests that he comment on this for three months now.
Here's some stuff about the American press.You don't have any knowledge of how the media work whatsoever, do you? You are woefully ignorant of the incessant pressure to come up with stories that sell copy. If an independent astronomer came up with such evidence then the media would be falling over themselves in a bidding war.
I find the "Moon Golf" to be an interesting show of physics.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=KZLl3XwlAIE
At 00:55 seconds in Alan Shepard hits a golf ball with a one armed stroke which is only about a quarter swing, the ball shoots off in a flurry of dust. The dust comes up similar to how Ashes would, as the golf balls has relatively low resistance and speeds along undeterred by the dust/debris.
To me, that would prove Men were on the moon and anyone that says otherwise is a complete loon.
I find the "Moon Golf" to be an interesting show of physics.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=KZLl3XwlAIE
At 00:55 seconds in Alan Shepard hits a golf ball with a one armed stroke which is only about a quarter swing, the ball shoots off in a flurry of dust. The dust comes up similar to how Ashes would, as the golf balls has relatively low resistance and speeds along undeterred by the dust/debris.
To me, that would prove Men were on the moon and anyone that says otherwise is a complete loon.
Pfft. Don't think we'll fall for the old mirror-on-the-moon trick. That's just a much, much bigger mirror in orbit.
dude if your serious than you are A TOTAL FREAKING MORON! dude if it was a big mirror the ISS would see it. Two, A lot of astronomors US and international would see it. So you are a total freaking retard. And why would the mirror be bigger, basic geometry dumb butt, it would have to be smaller. I hope youre not serious otherwise you must be like a 4th grade drop out or something.
Uhh uhhh they would move it back and forth with rockets! Or it could fold out! The moon is made of styrofoam!
Heh.