There might be few geologists who think the moon rocks are fake but the press and scientific journals are ignoring them. Also, if any geologists were to say that they were fake, their carreers would be ruined.
Look in the comment section of this video about the rocks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCN7qWrLHVw
Here's more about the rocks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AQQHTjeMkA
We are told that third parties tracked the missions. There are plausible scenerios that would explain that. If you think that it's implausible that secret deals were made, you should read Chomsky's analysis of the cold war. Also, you can watch this series of videos.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=moonfaker+cold+war&search_type=&aq=f
Those videos were in my last post. Have you watched them?
It's also plausible that a robot craft went to the moon, orbited during the length of the alleged missions and returned. All this may seem far-fetched but the video and still picturers show that the missions were faked.
It says a fuel dump was photographed. Pictures are fakable.
All the sightings have altenative explanations. The people who "Sighted" the craft might have been working for NASA or there might have been an actual robot craft.
If NASA says the parts of the Surveyor probe were exposed to moon conditions, it isn't necessarily true. NASA is the party accused of faking the whole thing.
The ultraviolet photos could have been taken from an orbiting craft or from a robot craft on the moon.
With the technology available today any picture is fakable so any future pictures of the equipment left on the moon will not be proof of anything.
There's nothing in that link that proves the missions were real and the video shows it was faked.