Agreed. And all of that is something that an informed person will take into consideration - both when they decide what kind of security they want (if any) and in where to purchase a home.
(BTW I pretty much ignore our HOA which is fairly easy since we're at the end of a long driveway and you can barely see our house to begin with. Easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission. But not everyone has that freedom.)
Few people consider or factor in their relatives when deciding on their security measures.
For example, would you factor in your brother in law raping your wife when you decide on what security measures you are going to take?
I live in a regular suburb, close to the city. It isn't like the inner-city suburbs one would find in the US, for example, but one where I am about 10 minutes out of city by car if all the lights are red, but it is a suburb where we all have big yards, local school, lots of parks, running and walking tracks, as well as bike paths that go on for miles.
People do not keep guard dogs here. Not only are such dogs dangerous, especially if you have children, but if someone enters my property legally and is injured by a dog, or if my children were injured or killed by such dogs, I would be liable, and criminally so, for keeping or maintaining dangerous dogs. This expectation that I am somehow responsible for my supposed inadequate home security and as such, share the blame for being raped and that I should have gone back and seen where I failed, because my money allowed me to keep such dogs and my failure to do so meant that I shared some responsibility for my rape, is without any doubt, a form of victim blaming and offers excuses to rapist - along the lines of - 'well, she could have afforded guard dogs, but she didn't, so it's not all your fault'.
What is reasonable for anyone who lives in a suburb is a fences, which I have, and I also have a front fence which is quite high, and a security gate at the front, which is also quite high. Quite a few in my street apply similar measures. I went above and beyond that by having a similar wall and security out-door 'door'/small gates with security pads on either side of my house as well, for anyone trying to access the back area of my property. As well as other security measures in my home as well (which few have where I live). This goes far beyond what most have in my suburb. Strangers would have a hard time breaking into my property. People who have visited my home on many many occasions would not, especially those who were around when we installed such measures years ago, and who used to visit and talk to us about it on many occasions.
As I said, few people factor in their close relatives breaking and entering and bypassing security measures, when they install and build such measures. And no one would consider such measures as a form of rape prevention against one's own family members. This expectation that we are now required to maintain some kind of fortress and guard dogs as a measure of rape prevention shows just how moronic rape prevention ideology has become.