Masculinity and men

Status
Not open for further replies.
Buddha1 said:
Is that the biologist speaking or the Spuriousmonkey?

That even after so many months of discussing the issue, while I have moved on, you're still stuck at using the unscientific and artificial traditional power base to refute the issues raised by me.

I never refuted the issue that you are gay.
 
Buddha1 said:
And can you tell me why do heterosexuals so much dig to be penetrated in the anus by female fingers and by sundry objects?

What is the meaning of tittie fucking then? Does that make them heterosexual again?
 
spuriousmonkey said:
You are saying that you are just recruiting men here on this forum you can fuck? Is that all there is to it?
So you're acknowleding that it is possible to recruit people who otherwise go by the heterosexual identity.....so behind all your bravado, you're too aware of the fact that every man has it in him to want to have sex with another man! :D
 
I accept.
I want to become Buddha1’s fuck-slave.
I want him to make me feel like a real man, for the first time in my life and teach me the culinary tastes of penis sucking.
My cavity wants to be filled by something really manly.
Not all that fake machismo stuff.
 
spuriousmonkey said:
So you are recruiting. The cat is out of the bag.
Oh yes I am......but then it proves my point that everyone has that inner need! You can't have it both ways --- say men are naturally heterosexual and then complain I'm recruiting them.
 
Last edited:
That reminds me of this interesting incident. In one of our stalls on AIDS, Gender and sexuality on the world AIDS Day (those were the initial years any my group worked with both boys and girls!), an old Britisher (I presume) happened to pass by.

Among several other posters on our issues, we had one that said "homosexuality is normal", (in those days I did not know that the word 'homosexuality' was faulty and misleading!)

So this Old gendleman caught a glimpse of it and immediately stopped. I was sitting behind the counter and my colleagues were busy in the background. The man seemed very angry about the poster. But he was in a foriegn country and probably a tourist, so he didn't quite shout but said in an angry and disdainful voice --- "you mean you are PROMOTING homosexuality?"

I was caught offguard, with that hostile confrontation......in my country people just don't have that kind of hostility to the topic......Those were my beginning years and I did not know many arguments in support of what we were taught was "homosexuality", .....so yes I was disconcerted and didn't quite know what to say.

My usual response would have been to get angry in return and to argue! But instead, I just kept sitting there with as calm a face as possible, and just said in a casual tone, "yes we are!"

The old man was obviously helpless, in a foriegn country --- perhaps in his own country he would have argued and fought. He became visibily shaken at that response. There were no arguments, no excuses, no explanations, no guilt, no shame, no defensiveness, and no aggression......he started trembling with anger.......he tried to say something but instead his mouth kept trembling.....he mumbled something I couldn't understand......and then he just left.
 
So my dear Spuriousmonkey --- yes most certainly I'm recruiting men --- and I think it is the most righteous thing to do. Getting in touch with their same sex feelings is a must if men ever hope to break free from social oppression by getting in touch with their natural masculinity.

For unless they reclaim their powers to bond with men, they can never never access or develop their positive natural masculinity.

For heterosexuality or girls can give them 'social masculinity' and 'power' but they can never give them 'natural masculinity' --- they can never teach them to be a man. This is something he can only learn by bonding with other men/ boys. And sexual bonds (i.e. emotional bonds which have sexuality as their basis, whether or not accompanied by actual sex) are the ultimate in male bonds --- on the materialistic/ physical plane. The next and perhaps the ultimate limit is spiritual bonds.

If anything has the potential to break men free from their age old shackles, and help them unite once again --- it is this power to love other men that they have lost.

And Youth is the only time you can really do anything about it, after that once a man's 'heterosexuality' (an unnatural, artificial state) is concretised by mutilating their same-sex needs, there is little hope for the man. He would have lost his power to bond with men forever (even if he can still have sex with a man!).

So, lets say I'm especially recruiting the youth! :) :m:
 
Buddha1 said:
Oh yes I am......but then it proves my point that everyone has that inner need! You can't have it both ways --- say men are naturally heterosexual and then complain I'm recruiting them.
If just by my talking here men's heterosexuality gives way, then heterosexuality is not all that natural or powerful a need in the first place. (I already know that, that's why I'm here!)
 
Buddha1 said:
Let's take no. 4 on the list:

BIG SIZE OF PENIS:

Does that reflect natural masculinity? Is it a sign of one's being masculine? an abundance of male/ hormones, testosterne perhaps?

On the opposite side, is a small penis sign of femininity --- lack of male hormones --- testosterone!
I think the answer is easy.

Lots of very powerful, aggressive and masculine men have small penises......many transvestites --- both heterosexual (sic) and homosexual (sic) and other feminine gendered males have big penises. Therefore it does not seem at all that the size of penis is either a mark or essence of masculinity. Rather it seems to be unaffected by the level of masculinity one has at all.

Perhaps it does add to the desirability of masculine men if they have long penises, but then again it may all be cultural.
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY

Men will lap up anything which is made a source of 'social masculinity' and transform themselves accordingly. It's not at all difficult to popularise/ enforce the heterosexual identity if it is made the only source of social manhood/ power, provided the society kills all venues for fulfilling male sexual/ emotional need for men in the mainstream/ straight society.
 
Stop spamming. That's fairly irritating.

It might be a stretch, but try and keep your "thoughts" in a leech long enough to avoid a throng of fucked and disjointed posts.

Oh, there's also the "edit" option.

faggot
 
Perfect said:
Stop spamming. That's fairly irritating.

It might be a stretch, but try and keep your "thoughts" in a leech long enough to avoid a throng of fucked and disjointed posts.

Oh, there's also the "edit" option.

faggot
No need to sign your post! :D
 
Let's talk about an interest in self-grooming, especially if it is abundant in a male. Or to enjoy looking at oneself in the mirror?

Is such 'narcissim' feminine?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top