Masculinity and men

Status
Not open for further replies.
but wouldn't that upset the delicate balance
between the inner masculine social outer feminine gender
and the social outer feminine natural inner masculine gender
of the species?
 
spuriousmonkey said:
Funny that every species' penis is adapted to fit in the vagina and not in the anus.

Exactly what I was talking about just a few minutes ago. Amazing! :eek:
 
Giambattista said:
Some cultures (and I suspect Buddha's is no different ;) ) have arranged marriages. Not only are you expected to marry, but often your spouse is pre-chosen. Though, I suppose there are ways to get around all that.

I think Buddha was probably referring more to 90%+, which by American standards would probably seem like EVERYONE.

What happens if someone does NOT wish to cooperate? What if they say, "NO! I'm not going along with this! I'm NOT going to get married."
 
spuriousmonkey said:
Funny that every species' penis is adapted to fit in the vagina and not in the anus.
Really, do they teach you that in your biology degree? :rolleyes:

And would you say that the penis is not also designed to be masturbated by another man or to feel pleasure when it is done?

Is it big enough to fit into the mouth?
 
spuriousmonkey said:
Funny that every species' penis is adapted to fit in the vagina and not in the anus.
Really, all you're doing is to exert the fake social femininity on male-male desire by invoking the contempt that has been generated for 'getting fucked'.

My job is to expose this mechanism, and show how it works so that men stop being afraid of it.
 
spuriousmonkey said:
Funny that every species' penis is adapted to fit in the vagina and not in the anus.
And can you tell me why do heterosexuals so much dig to be penetrated in the anus by female fingers and by sundry objects?
 
And I have also observed this subtle/ suppressed desire in true heterosexual men to cross dress......and many of them do secretly cross-dress.

Can you tell me why do heterosexuals like to do that?
 
spuriousmonkey said:
Funny that every species' penis is adapted to fit in the vagina and not in the anus.
Is that the biologist speaking or the Spuriousmonkey?

That even after so many months of discussing the issue, while I have moved on, you're still stuck at using the unscientific and artificial traditional power base to refute the issues raised by me.
 
leopold99 said:
if what buddha says is true
then why do we need men and women to procreate?
Who can deny that procreation needs male-female sex? That is why it is for. But it just needs a two minute fuck. male-female relationships/ casual sex (both essence of heterosexuality) are redundant. And remember nature is frugal.

When we talk about heterosexuality we should clearly demarcate between

a.) procreative sex (not necessarily the same as marital sex --- most of marital sex is non-procreative) on one hand, and

b.) casual sex/ relationships/ marriage on the other.

Only the first one is natural the second category --- the essence of heterosexuality is unnatural.

But why are we discussing homosexuality in this thread. What is it with you guys?
 
and remember nature has made only as many percentage of male-female procreative sex as is necessary for a healthy population level, that nature can sustain in a balanced way along with other flora and fauna!

Heterosexualty involves almost total participation of men into procreation (that too by force!) which is again unnatural, uncalled for and harmful.
 
If nature wanted men and women to have sex for pleasure, it would have given them natural means of birth control.
 
If nature wanted men and women to have long term emotional bonds it would not have made them so different from each other.
 
And, if nature wanted men and women to have sex for pleasure it would not have made their orgasms so different from each other.

Remember, most women cannot reach orgasm through vaginal intercourse.
 
Buddha1 said:
Really, do they teach you that in your biology degree? :rolleyes:

And would you say that the penis is not also designed to be masturbated by another man or to feel pleasure when it is done?

Is it big enough to fit into the mouth?

There is a difference between primary adaptation and secundary acquisation of function. In short, the fact that an organism is used for something else doesn't diminish the primary function.

You must be aware that some men like to have sex with a shoe. That doesn't mean that the primary function of the penis is to penetrate the vagina.
 
Buddha1 said:
Really, all you're doing is to exert the fake social femininity on male-male desire by invoking the contempt that has been generated for 'getting fucked'.

My job is to expose this mechanism, and show how it works so that men stop being afraid of it.

You are saying that you are just recruiting men here on this forum you can fuck? Is that all there is to it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top