In the late 1800's astronomers were focusing their telescopes and attention to Mars. Astronomers such as: Rev. Pietro Angelo Secchi, (1818-78); Giovanni Virginio Schiaparelli, (1835-1910); Percival Lowell, (1855-1916); William Henry Pickering, (1858-1938); Andrew Ellicott Douglass, (1867-1962); Edward Emerson Barnard, (1857-1923); William Wallace Campbell, (1862-1938); William Huggins, (1824-1910); Camille Flammarion, (1842-1925); Eugène Michael Antoniadi, (1870-1944); Henri Perrotin, (1845-1904), Earl C. Slipher, (1883-1964); to list just a few.
What the astronomers of the late 1800's were discovering was canals on Mars, first called canali by Rev. Secchi in 1858 and Giovanni Schiaparelli in 1877. Many of these astronomers verified the canals and also noted seasonal changes on the surface that corresponded with the melting of the polar ice (Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) Science Investigation
1, The Encyclopedia of Astrobiology, Astronomy, and Spaceflight
2 or Astronomy Picture of the Day Archive, NASA)
3. It seems at the end of 1800's early 1900's astronomers were recording canals, seasonal surface changes, theorized to be changes in possible plant growth and water dispersion. "In 1888...Perrotin
4 described having observed dramatic changes in a feature, named "Libya" by Schiaparelli, and assumed to be a continental land mass. "Clearly visible two years ago, it no longer exists today," and "By 1892, Perrotin
5 had switched his attention to watching for "bright projections" on Mars, reporting three in the summer of that year". By 1909 no signs of the canals existed according to Antoniadi
6.
In 1894 Percival Lowell
7 noted a tawny colored cloud of dust that extended over 300 miles and Percival Lowell from his research estimated the temperature on the surface of Mars to be an average of 48°F noted from the MOLA Science, NASA
8. Percival Lowell's temperature was later verified by the Russian Mars 3 lander. In 1971 the Mars 3 recorded temperature readings on the surface of Mars "the coldest point proved to be the north polar cap, where the temperature was -110°C (-166°F); elsewhere the values ranged from -93° to 13°C (-135°-55°F), depending on the latitude and time of day" (Sheeman, Chapter 12)
9. According to a Mars data web page, "Recent observations with the Hubble Space Telescope have revealed that the conditions during the Viking missions may not have been typical. Mars' atmosphere now seems to be both colder and dryer than measured by the Viking landers", (SEDS, The Nine Planets, Mars)
10. The Space Telescope Science Institute (STSci) report, MARS: A Cooler, Clearer World
11, states the fact several times that the Mars surface temperature has changed since Viking landing missions, constantly dropping in temperature. Fact, the Viking 1 landed on Mars on July 20, 1976, continuous recording data until Nov. 11, 1982, over six years of recordings.
Mariner 9
12 waited until the cloud storm of 1971 had subsided somewhat to activate the camera. A similar cloud storm was observed in 1956. At that time Mariner 9
13 recorded the canyon Valles Marineris whereas the canyon had never been viewed as a canyon prior to Mariner 9. The canals had been viewed, surface changes had been viewed but never a massive canyon.
According to Planetscapes, VIKING ORBITER VIEWS OF MARS, M.H. Carr, et. al., NASA SP-441
14:
-The canyons do not form a well-integrated drainage system
-Indicate downward subsidence of canyon floors along faults
-Impact craters, which are so numerous on other Martian terrains, are scare within Valles Marineris
-No evidence of flow of water has been found within Valles Marineris, although some channels on the adjacent upland are abruptly truncated by steep canyon walls
-Because these canyons are poorly linked with one another, and their floors not a regularly graded slope, they could not have formed as water drainage features.
In 1954 National Geographic
15 sponsored a Mars observation project at Lamount-Hussey Obervator, Bloemfontein, South Africa on Naval Hill an altitude of 4888 feet. From this National Geographic sponsored expedition 20,000 pictures were taken of Mars. The pictures themselves stand as their own interpretation. The National Geographic article
16 resulting from this project was "New Light on the Changing Face of Mars, A Huge Green Area Almost the Size of Texas Appears in Photographs Made by National Geographic Society-Lowell Observatory Mars Expedition to South Africa", September 1955, pages 427 to 436 written by Dr. E.C. Slipher. The picture in the National Geographic article reveals the areas mentioned as blue-green seasonal change. September 1954, two years before the 1956 planet wide dust storm.
Various observers over those earlier years with differences in equipment, varying observation periods but still these anomalies on Mars were verified by other researchers
References:
1 http://ltpwww.gsfc.nasa.gov/tharsis/canals.html
2 http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/ETEmain.html
3 http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap031112.html
4 -5 http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/P/Perrotin.html
6 http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/A/Antoniadi.html
7 http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/L/LowellP.html
8 http://ltpwww.gsfc.nasa.gov/tharsis/canals.html
9 -12-13 http://www.uapress.arizona.edu/online.bks/mars/chap12.htm
10 http://www.nineplanets.org/mars.html
11 http://oposite.stsci.edu/pubinfo/background-text/plntwthr.txt
14 http://www.planetscapes.com/solar/history/SP-441/ch3.htm
15-16 The National Geographic, The Complete National Geographic 112 Years, "New Light on the Changing Face of Mars, A Huge Green Area Almost the Size of Texas Appears in Photographs Made by National Geographic Society-Lowell Observatory Mars Expedition to South Africa", Dr. E.C. Slipher, 1955, pg 427-436.
All these references are considered reliable sourses, each reference is information of scientific investigation; from Nasa, to individual scholars, even the National Geographic Society.
This information documents the changes Mars went through and in our rescent past.
If there is an anomoly that appears not just on Mars but many of the planetary bodies in our solar system, if not all, if this anomoly is brought to your attention, if this anomoly is not explained properly by the present scientific communities theory of causality such as with W. Bottke, Richardson and Love's tidal disruption theory, since their simulation as W. Bottke himself admits does not generate random size, then I put the issue to all of you and the science community as their responsibility to investigate this anomoly further because the crater chains labeled CS chains is far too uniform, too extensive in size to be explained away by the happen chance of ice and mud astroid or comet.
It is not your responsibility as someone putting themselves forward as interested bodies in the theater of science to character assassinate individuals putting forward information that illustrates the accepted theories is not the model of explaination for in this particular example the causality of the anomoly known as crater chains. It is the responsibility of the science community and those interested bodies in the threater of science to investigate crater chains for such reasons as the chain anomoly is extensive in size, covers massive area, is uniform in overal configuation, is as the science community has already stated formed simultaneously. Any interested bodies in the theater of science that resorts to such tactics as verbal or otherwise assaults on anothers character or line of questioning in this issue is not using viable scientific, mathematical or logical reasoning resulting in unusable answers to the line of questioning.
Mr. Craterchains has possed a viable line of investigation into the anomoly known as crater chains, now defined as CS chains, it is the responsibility of the science community and those interested bodies in the theater of science to further investigate without banter of ones logical reasoning or assaults on anothers character.