Addessing points? You've addressed anything BUT the point.
Out right lie - I (and others) have given you a plausable explanation, I've even provided justification as to why it might be a valid explanation.
Why does an ambulance despatch need to know the ethnicity of a child that needs medical attention?
I still haven't received an answer to that.
PRCS and MDA Ambulances (and paramedics) are attacked.
PRCS and MDA Ambulances (and paramedics) are attacked in occupied jerusalem.
The PRCS and MDA have an accord to ensure the saftey of the ambulances and paramedics.
Sending the wrong ambulance service to the wrong neighbourhood poses a security risk to the patient, and to the EMS technicians.
Therefore it would seem reasonable to determine which ambulance service to dispatch, which, given that it's been stated or implied that occupations, evictions and demonstrations are a daily thing in this area, it would seem reasonable to ask the person on the ground which ambulance service to send, rather than make an assumption base don information that could be out of date (by asking about the location, as you asserted).
I merely translated arab and jew to their hebrew counterparts and suddenly you're very particular about exactly what was said.
How sad is that
I can't work out if you're being naive, stupid, dishonest, or all three here.
Do you really know that little about linguistics? As someone who's (at least) bilingual, I would have expected you to know better than to make a statement like this.
Of course the exact phraseology matters, especially when viewed in light of some of the links I've provided you.
It has the potential to make the difference between asking about the people in the neighbourhood or the mob, or the person requiring assitance.
At the moment, we only have your assumption, or the assumption of the person writing the blog that the question was directed at the patient rather than the neighbourhood.