Let's all have a big fight over my mortal soul.

[Gustav]

Assuming that atheism is an "educational system"? What does this classify as? Re-education?

semantics. you profess ignorance of the implications of what you wish to advance? rather one dimensional, i think. with damning consequences if i may further add

oh
q aint got shit
allow me to warm up
i really do intend harm

 

[S.A.M.]

I should, shouldn't I. I'm just not prepared to pay eBay sellers' exorbitant prices though.

(I expect I'll get round to it. £0.01 start.)

The first chapter for your edification

http://richarddawkins.net/godDelusion

 

[S.A.M.]

semantics. you profess ignorance of the implications of what you wish to advance? rather one dimensional, i think. with damning consequences if am may further add

Back at you buster. Or do you profess knowledge of the damning consequences (or absence thereof) of what you wish to advance? Eugenics and racism, or elimination of the riff-raff is not a religious domain. If "love thy neighbor" can become so twisted, what are your guarantees for the benefits of individualistic hubris? Oh wait, let me guess, you have a VISION!

 

[redarmy11]

eBooks hurt the bit that lies between my brain and my eyes.

My optic nerve. Terrible grief in my optic nerve.

 

[Varda]

The first chapter for your edification

http://richarddawkins.net/godDelusion

CHAPTER 4 is where it's at, though

 

[Atom]

Because what we usually consider to be our "self", is actually directly and indirectly made up of what other people have said about us or to us.
A self exists only in direct or indirect relation to others.

Hence we look for answers elsewhere.

Look but don't find usually.

 

[S.A.M.]

CHAPTER 4 is where it's at, though

Since I consider him a kook, its all the same to me.

Don't forget to donate to THE CAUSE though <click on image>



And pick up the Tshirt and badges here

 

[redarmy11]

Non-profit.

 

[S.A.M.]

Non-profit.

Of course, aren't they all?:shrug:

 

[Atom]

CHAPTER 4 is where it's at, though

I'll give it a miss if its alright with you.

Its interesting that both Hitchens and Amis were pro-Iraq and Afghan War..as Dawkins is of the same ilk has he squeaked anything about it or does he prefer to hide away in academia?

 

[Varda]

Since I consider him a kook, its all the same to me.

you have got to be kidding me

 

[Varda]

I'll give it a miss if its alright with you.

Its interesting that both Hitchens and Amis were pro-Iraq and Afghan War..as Dawkins is of the same ilk has he squeaked anything about it or does he prefer to hide away in academia?

what does that have to do with the discussion here?

 

[Atom]

you have got to be kidding me

Why not, Dickie Dawkins has.

 

[Varda]

are you sure you are not allowing your personal opinion about him interfere with your ability to process his logic?

 

[Atom]

what does that have to do with the discussion here?

A lot.

Especially if these 'secularists' are encouraging the bombing of your country.

 

[Atom]

are you sure you are not allowing your personal opinion about him interfere with your ability to process his logic?

Logic is a poor mans Wisdom.

 

[S.A.M.]

you have got to be kidding me

I've discussed my opinion of his logic elsewhere; he is a singularly uniformed man who should stick to biology.

 

[Enmos]

Logic is a poor mans Wisdom.

:roflmao:

 

[redarmy11]

I like a man in a uniform.

 

[Varda]

A lot.

Especially if these 'secularists' are encouraging the bombing of your country.

Oh, I'm sorry, I am aware that I can't expect everyone to be able to know that one thing is one thing, and another thing is something else, but sometimes i forget