Originally posted by James R
Are you talking about consent to sex with a person of the same age, or consent to sex with people in general?
If you ask me whether I think a girl of age 16 should be able to consent to sex with a man of age 18, my answer may well be different than if you ask me whether I think a girl of age 16 should be able to consent to sex with a man of age 50.
Originally posted by James R
The difference is potentially in the level of understanding of that each party has of what is going on, along with the potential for manipulation of one party by the other.
it doesn't matter which age is more expirienced, it matters at what age is a person more responsivle for their own actions.well i dated a 16 year old and she was more experianced than me (not hard) so 16 seems a good age to me
Originally posted by notme2000
Legal consent has nothing to do with actual consent...
Originally posted by James R
Are you talking about consent to sex with a person of the same age, or consent to sex with people in general?
If you ask me whether I think a girl of age 16 should be able to consent to sex with a man of age 18, my answer may well be different than if you ask me whether I think a girl of age 16 should be able to consent to sex with a man of age 50.
Originally posted by notPresidentAndrew
How can anyone say that 13 and under is an adequate "age of consent?" That's far too young! Yuck!
I'm stating that no matter what age we set as a law, they're still going to make their own decisions, regardless...what are you responding to when you say that?