Or perhaps just use it in fewer jokes.Welp, I suppose we need use the word "rape" more sparingly in the future.
Or perhaps just use it in fewer jokes.Welp, I suppose we need use the word "rape" more sparingly in the future.
There are tens of thousands, and entire industries that have not been addressedI'm wondering should the movement die once the carcass has been devoured. There are only so many exploiters of high position to be had.
It's serious here, regardless of what you claim it to be. It wasn't "made" serious, by anyone - it was serious from the first word on. And "appreciating the humor" is something almosteverybody raised in the culture does automatically - it's just that their "appreciation" is differently informed, often by having been targets of such humor.Perhaps they appreciate the humor in those posts. It's serious only if you make it serious.
How such things appear to someone who posts "jokes" like that is not much of a concern, unless counting a narrow margin of votes or under attack by a klan of them. It reinforces the stereotype of the clueless arrested development characteristic of such folk, but so what?However, the #MeToo movement, to me, appears to reinforce that stereotype: weak, fragile, and incompetent.
More normal than odd. Why would he be worried about the police? They hadn't been a problem in his sex life so far.But the way he left the scene, it didn't seem he was too concerned about the act being reported to police. Really odd.
It didn't pass on the one and only. Not much hope for the future.Or perhaps just use it in fewer jokes.
So, the women were not the problem?lol Not quite.
But there was no mention of "rape."Actually, the video you posted showed a weird guy singing sexually disgusting graphic lyrics about all the things he wants women to do to him, sexually. It was very educational. The ''dancers'' weren't the issue.
If you insist.You post a ''joke'' about rape...
I want to believe this site is a firm supporter of diversity.Again, if this was a trashy site, then it would fit. But, SF isn't that kind of a site.
Okay, i will move on.Why not just accept some responsibility that this kind of stuff is inappropriate, and move on.
By all indications it is. However, you can't support diversity by supporting intolerance - and trivializing rape is a pretty strong move towards intolerance.I want to believe this site is a firm supporter of diversity.
And if I have faith that you can judge for yourself, regardless of what might be said by myself or others, what greater tolerance might be obtained? Anyways, they haven't removed the joke from the site, so I'm appreciative.By all indications it is. However, you can't support diversity by supporting intolerance - and trivializing rape is a pretty strong move towards intolerance.
That's no excuse, in his case or any similar.(Note that I am not saying you are intolerant; I have a feeling you just posted that joke without thinking about it too much
I have a following?The main reason Bowser's crowd hasn't buddied up and destroyed the tolerance and the forum is that it remains - via moderation - outnumbered here.
We draw a line at misogyny. Misogynists are not welcome here. Just so you know.I want to believe this site is a firm supporter of diversity.
They have now. Clearly, a gentle message was not sufficient to get through to you.Anyways, they haven't removed the joke from the site, so I'm appreciative.
Misogynists! I see no misogynists.We draw a line at misogyny. Misogynists are not welcome here. Just so you know.
Sexism. Hmm. I am a sexist, but not in a bad way. I accept both male and female sexes. No discrimination, I promise.Keep your sexism to yourself when you're posting here. Clear?
Perhaps consult a mirror?Misogynists! I see no misogynists.
No. You're in a crowd, and typical enough to identify it. Another term might be "mob".I have a following?
Perhaps a dictionary would be better?Perhaps consult a mirror?
I don't think you even realise how your sexism could be bad. You seem completely unable to put yourself in a woman's shoes and look at your attitudes and behaviour from her point of view.Sexism. Hmm. I am a sexist, but not in a bad way.
A guy who thinks rape jokes are funny would qualify.Perhaps a dictionary would be better?
"a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against women."
Okay. I didn't see that in the definition, but okay.A guy who thinks rape jokes are funny would qualify.
I don't think you even realise how your sexism could be bad. You seem completely unable to put yourself in a woman's shoes and look at your attitudes and behaviour from her point of view.
They wouldn't have much to talk about.It's quite likely that women discuss your sexist attitudes behind your back and you're not even aware they are doing it.
sexism (n.) Discriminatory or abusive attitudes towards members of the opposite sex.My sexist attitude is that men and women are different by nature.
You really are clueless.They wouldn't have much to talk about.
Do you report these posts when you see them?
If you can change definitions, so can I.sexism (n.) Discriminatory or abusive attitudes towards members of the opposite sex.
How old are you? If you're not aware of what sexism is by now, please correct your education.
Not at all. I don't treat women with any less respect than I would another man. What's there to talk about?You really are clueless.