In the same vein, what is the fault of the person who gets hit by a stray bullet?
The word "stray". Is abortion a "stray" bullet? Do you blame the woman for being raped? Should she be put to death as well?
In the same vein, what is the fault of the person who gets hit by a stray bullet?
The point is, that even if rape is the stray bullet, the woman is the victim, the child is also her child. Aborting the child of a rape is basically considering the child as co-conspirator in the crime.
The point is, that even if rape is the stray bullet, the woman is the victim, the child is also her child. Aborting the child of a rape is basically considering the child as co-conspirator in the crime.
You see abortion as murder, yet you want an exception for rape. I'd like to know the logic behind your ideas. If there indeed is any. It seems mostly based on self-righteous misogyny. 'How dare she have sex when she wasn't going to have a baby! Whore! She should keep her legs closed!'
it just would not be a good precedent for children of rape to be born for many factors. one is the knowledge that they were a product of rape, they will most likely be abused or rejected by the mother and therefore have to be adopted, that is even if they are adopted.
the other issue is that you don't see rape as a natural occurence as a rule in nature. there is probably a beneficial reason why one would mutually choose based on certain characteristics. rape would probably produce individuals that are genetically even more fractured or with competing internal issues than what lifeforms already have to deal with.
The point is, that even if rape is the stray bullet, the woman is the victim, the child is also her child. Aborting the child of a rape is basically considering the child as co-conspirator in the crime.
biblical notion
When its a D&C they are scraping cells, when its an abortion, they are getting rid of a child.
These sorts of eugenics arguments also apply to "poor people," "gays," and "the blacks," note.
When they say, the human fetus feels no pain at 24 weeks, what they mean is..."by all the means of measures available to us...the human fetus feels no pain at 24 weeks", How do we know that the fetus is simply incapable of responding in a way that can be assessed?
I refuse to believe that a fetus who can hear cannot feel his limbs being torn off. That just sounds incredible to me.
I live in a Third World country, both my parents came from very poor backgrounds. I know how difficult life can be, I also know people can overcome the worst odds if given the opportunity perhaps that is one reason I don't consider life so cheap that it can be thrown away without a second's thought
nature plays eugenics.
i'm sure you picked your spouse for certain characteristics, that's still eugenics.
Much agreed.
By the way, if anyone was wondering, abortion is very wrong in my eyes -- and I'm completely non-religious. Would any of you like to have been aborted?
Much agreed.
visceral said:Why should a zygote get rights that override those of a woman? Or those of 8 cells, or 16? Or something that still only consists of ectoderm, endoderm and mesoderm? That isn't just disproportionate and illogical. It's insulting to her humanity.
The desire to live is an innate drive in humans and animals, birch. You can't live without consequences and risks. Depriving something of its future because of the risk of "you don't know it won't suffer" is ludicrous.what makes you think that a child that is a product of rape would like to be born? what makes you think everyone wanted to be born just because you did? what makes you think that this child will not suffer mentally and emotionally just from that knowledge and from the mother's rejection?
Why is this relevant? We can deter without force.it's so easy to say, let everyone be born. okay, are you going to be the one to force this woman to have the child, tie her down so she doesn't hurt herself or the fetus? make sure she takes care of herself and make sure that child has adoptive parents at the ready?
Think so? Because minimizing the process (not to mention the importance) of fetal development for the reason that it begins with a small number of cells is insulting to humanity on an incomprehensible scale, because all of us started out that way. Yes, even you, when you were just an insignificant mass.
The desire to live is an innate drive in humans and animals, birch. You can't live without consequences and risks. Depriving something of its future because of the risk of "you don't know it won't suffer" is ludicrous.