You are still only explaining internal work done. This does does not give a mechanism to change the variance to constant.
It is always dark, Light is an illusion and not a thing!
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
Ignorant garbage.
So if the atom stopped emitting you would say time has stopped? I have to laugh at the idea.
You know I am correct about time dilation, early in the thread I even gave a model that shows you this.
You are saying time stops if the atom stops beating, that is funny.
I don't think you've ever posted anything you're correct about.
Yes I have, if you do not understand it, you are not on the same wavelength , that is not my fault, my logic of time dilation is undeniable. my logic of a time cube is undeniable. My alternative theory has merit.
Yes you are, if you think time is an atom, and in any way a difference in timing of the atoms, is in any way related to time itself.
Fairy tale science, and that is why I question it.
No I said nothing about work, which applies to machines. That's irrelevant.
"Internal" vs "external" is meaningless. The spectra altered by refraction remain altered unless acted on by subsequent refraction. There is none in the examples you listed. So what's your point?
Yield to the truth, bub. It will allow you to move on (preferably to other sites) to attack every other principle of science with deliberate ignorance of the facts presented by future readers.
Whatever floats your boat, I guess.
I already told you there is no mechanism. No machine is involved. This is a purely natural phenomenon covered under the applicable laws of nature, which enforce the constancy of c in a vacuum. Part of that law enforcement requires that the velocity of light changes in media which fill that void of space, thereby altering the impedance acting on the light waves. Also required is that the frequency shifts as the velocity deviates from c.
See Snell's Law.
Hence your entire set of claims has been trumped.
Speaking of law enforcement, are you waiting for the mods to read you your rights, or are you going to concede that you did not understand until now that the medium alters the spectrum of light wherever refraction occurs, and that it occurs everywhere the impedance changes?
Landau Roof
Registered Senior Member
You are correct, but it doesn't automatically make him a savant either. Consider your own case.
Lookee. It's been 250 posts or 13 pages. Do us and yourself a favor and reprint your 'proof' again if you are not lying. No one wants to skim through 250 posts trying to find it. Thank you.
How old are you?
Are you a juvenile playing games and trolling just to piss people off?
I mean, I have already informed you and given you links supporting time dilation as a fact....
I have told you if you have anything of substance, get it peer reviewed.
And what do we get back in return?? Excuses, more excuses, continued inane claims, still no evidence, still no science, lies, more excuses, more lies.
You need to heed the message in the next video...just trying to be helpful.....
Landau Roof
Registered Senior Member
Why assume he is a teenager? S/he could be some rotund Armenian-American grandmama in her well appointed Sacramento kitchen who comes to troll here between preparing the family meals. As she said, having no formal education does not mean you are stupid - although I grant you, this grandmama is either rather dense or just having us on. Maybe we all ought to stop feeding the troll now.
Last edited:
No doubt the mods will read me the riot act before long. In saying that, it depends if the mods understand the definition of alternative, and I am quite sure they do.
You can post has many links on present knowledge as you like, I have read them over and over again.
The people who are posting have no idea what being objective is.
Work does not mean a machine, I suggest the person looks up the word work.
If I was trolling, I would multi post on all subjects, and then I would piss people off. Gravity included would be argued.
I stand by my idea, and have provided the evidence observation tests, that prove what I am saying to be true.
I am 41, a family man, and not insane or deluded.
So far most posters in this thread, have only one purpose , to get another person banned.
It is you are trolling a perfectly innocent thread.
I am not attacking you, so refrain from the insults and attacking me as a person. Feel free to criticise the idea, and discuss the idea, otherwise do not post. It is your choice to read and post.
You can post has many links on present knowledge as you like, I have read them over and over again.
The people who are posting have no idea what being objective is.
Work does not mean a machine, I suggest the person looks up the word work.
If I was trolling, I would multi post on all subjects, and then I would piss people off. Gravity included would be argued.
I stand by my idea, and have provided the evidence observation tests, that prove what I am saying to be true.
I am 41, a family man, and not insane or deluded.
So far most posters in this thread, have only one purpose , to get another person banned.
It is you are trolling a perfectly innocent thread.
I am not attacking you, so refrain from the insults and attacking me as a person. Feel free to criticise the idea, and discuss the idea, otherwise do not post. It is your choice to read and post.
The word light, not even a term that science made, a term accepted long before science. An invisible pink unicorn, science accepted to be true, in acceptance of the word, you accept where the word came from.
Science accepted light, with no value of scientific clarification.
Science accepted light, with no value of scientific clarification.
No light is not a bunch of dots.
This information is very easy to look up.
Here is how a prisim works.
It appears that all of your ideas are based on ignorance and nothing but guesses.
They are not guess work, I have even done the slit experiment using my eyes.
I know ''light'' is not a bunch of dots. of different spectral qualities , I also know science perceives it to be a mixture of frequencies, when in reality there is nothing to show this, nothing for assumption, because we can not measure ''light'' without interaction that makes the oscillation.
Your devices are set up to measure, exactly what they have been told to measure, it is almost comical,
I understand you can not see what I see, or consider what I have seen,
According to science, the mixture of frequencies, separate by no means.
You can not have a random process, and un-random it with out a separation means.
It just physically can not work.
You are saying that several different frequencies in a mix, magically line up in order before entry to a prism.
Do you ever get tired of being wrong?
Light is em radiation that has wavelengths in the visual range.
Em radiation is split into a visual range by interaction.
EM radiation itself is not visible unless by interaction.
p.s - I do not do wrong, I am vigorous.
- Status