You have clearly and often demonstrated that you don't.
It is always dark, Light is an illusion and not a thing!
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
If there is no light, you can't see.
I have tried that, but when standing on the shoulders of giants, and I read fairy tales about time dilation, forgive me if it is not reading true to reality.
You avoid all questions, because you have no answers.
If there is no energy, you can not see in the dark.
Think what you think, I have time on my side, and one day I will find someone who understands and someone who can do the Maxwell bit.
I have an alternative theory, so of cause it is different to conventional.pfff
Time dilation is verified and proven.
To ignore such proof, is unscientific and stupid.
You have no questions, except misinterpretations and made up fairy tales of what is accepted and what is reality.
And Finally for me, you can keep shouting your crap from the rooftops and all over the internet.
It makes no difference. The scientific method and peer review is designed to weed out the nuts, trolls and ignoramuses from the legitimate science.
No one is listening to your crap, and thankfully one day it will be buried along with you when your time comes.
Timing dilation, nothing to do with actual time, time does not care what the atom does.
This is simple logic, and is undeniable. What proof?
It is especially undeniable when you ignore all experimental and theoretical results in favor of your imagination.
a, being the atom on the ground, b being the atom at altitude, c been time, a or b does not affect c.
see explanation, and stop falling for illusion.
The concept that time dilates is the illusion, time is not an atom, the difference should of been explained by physics.
The timing is different by physics, this is in no way associated with actual time.
http://www.alternativephysics.org/book/TimeDilationExperiments.htm
http://www.learner.org/teacherslab/science/light/
http://science.howstuffworks.com/light.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck_Institute_for_the_Science_of_Light
The first link is some of the overwhelming evidence supporting SR/GR and time dilation.
Actually, I'm feeling rather sympathetic to someone as delusional as yourself.
The above links, some very basic for kids, are given to help you overcome your phobias and shortcomings.
I can only cross my fingers and hope they have some effect....although I seriously doubt it.
I know the information, time is not an atom, an atom is timing, not time.
Time dilation?? nothing to do with time?????
Time does not care what the atom does????
This is simple logic??? and undeniable???
Everything you have said is far, far removed from anything that even smells like logic.
Besides taking lessons in physics, you also need lessons in English methinks!
Oh, And again, you can keep shouting your crap from the rooftops and all over the internet.
It makes no difference. The scientific method and peer review is designed to weed out the nuts, trolls and ignoramuses from the legitimate science.
No one is listening to your crap, and thankfully one day it will be buried along with you when your time comes.
Find me one link, one person, one shred of real observational evidence that invalidates the incumbent model of light and supports your fairy tales, and I'll post a retraction of everything I have said.
I won't hold my breath though.
Bye, have fun Hans!
You really don't know anything about physics. Time dilation has been demonstrated by cesium clocks in jet aircraft, by the extended life of muons traveling at relativistic speed, and by particles in accelerators.
Your ignorance almost matches your stupidity.
The onus is on you to do that. You came here propounding confused and false claims which contradict physics. So now prove that physics wrong. Put up or shut up.
Really what. Yes, physics is grounded in reality. When you contradict physics you contradict Nature. Really.
You mean you intend to post baseless claims so you don't have to do any work disproving the physics you deny even though you have no idea what it teaches.
You don't have a theory. You have bald claims which have been proven not only frivolous but flat wrong.
Everyone has. You're just not listening. For starters you admit that you lack training in science. That invalidates every argument you've raised regardless of content, and removes the burden of proof you think falls on readers -- even though they have disproved you nonetheless.
Meaningless gibberish. The impedance changes in transmission media, thereby altering the propagation velocity and hence the frequency.
No. The particles which typically produce light do. But that has nothing to with this. Light is electromagnetic which means it's affected by the impedance of the medium. Nature requires that the velocity of propagation be c in the intrinsic impedance of free space. Therefore the velocity of transmission in physical media must vary according to the impedance of the material. Hence along any surface marked by variations in characteristic impedance the velocity, and hence the frequency, of the waves will be altered.
No. Impedance is a resistance that varies with frequency. And wherever mismatch occurs reflection results. You have completely missed the boat by failing to try to learn the relevant science.
Meaningless gibberish.
So? You asked what the mechanism [sic] was and I just told you. Now repeat it back to me as a sign that you concede to superior facts and evidence.
You have nothing, just error and gibberish.
Now do something about it. Concede.
Timing dilation, not time, omg, you define the timing, then say time is dilating because your time recording device is different to another, that is a fault in the device, not a change in time.
Time does not give two hoots how you time , time, and what device you use, it has no interest, it is a singularity that does not change or can be equally represented.
You are deluded if you think recording time , is actual time.
- Status