Well said friend. May G-d bless you and yours.
You don't actually agree with that load of bs?:bugeye:
Well said friend. May G-d bless you and yours.
But it has other roots than merely blind prejudice or ignorant error. My own somewhat jaundiced view of Islam, for example, dates back to the Salman Rushdie affair - and it was not the press that presented me with this view, but my own reactions to the majority of Muslims writing letters and reacting to the event in my presence.
There are people like diamondheart, here, in every religion and every country - but not so many, and so ubiquitous.
They aren't. And you illustrate the matter with your examples - individual Muslims in the modern era, famous schools of thought and Islamic institutions of the distant past.
Then why are so many in the Islamic Terrorist Movement Saudi?
http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/937fxvva.asp
The Saudi Connection
In Iraq and elsewhere, terrorism thrives with Saudi support.
by Stephen Schwartz
07/30/2007 12:00:00 AM
I did mention that "robot" was not the right word here.
But the other confusion is now apparent - are we talking about the principles, or the details of establishment? We were comparing the Pillars with traffic rules, and now we are talking about the details of clerical law - which would have been a more reasonable comparison to traffic rules. This shifting of the frame seems to be unconscious.
Are you arguing for childhood conditioning by threat of the myriad petty Western adult laws, or not ?
It is definitely odd, for those with my upbringing.
I'm not sure how your sociologist sources "noted" the effects of fundie theistic belief on imagination and reaction and assumption. It surely is possible to establish, even quantify in some respects, but would you lend credence?
You are surely justified in complaining of the unfair treatment in the Western press.
But it has other roots than merely blind prejudice or ignorant error. My own somewhat jaundiced view of Islam, for example, dates back to the Salman Rushdie affair - and it was not the press that presented me with this view, but my own reactions to the majority of Muslims writing letters and reacting to the event in my presence. There are people like diamondheart, here, in every religion and every country - but not so many, and so ubiquitous.
They aren't. And you illustrate the matter with your examples - individual Muslims in the modern era, famous schools of thought and Islamic institutions of the distant past.
The Muslim world represents 25% of the human race. This large impoverished, and exploited segment of the world population cannot be kept in chains forever. Our desire is for political, religious, economical, and military independence for our people. ...
Fact of the matter is that terrorists do not operate in Saudiland like they do elsewhere. There may be some clerics here and there who urge some action, no different than some of the priests in the US, but from the Imam of the Greand Mosque to the people of Saudiland, terrorism has been denounced time and time again, and severe laws have been active for ages now.
Here is the fact of the manner, not all muslims are terrorists, but all major terrorists are Muslim.
If you guys don't want that kind of publicity than reconsider the whole idea of death to America, destruction of Israel, plane hijackings and all of that other shit you guys do.
Fact of the matter is that Islamic Terrorist do operate in and from Saudiland, and Saudiland is one of the largest supplier of Terrorist.
Now as to those laws? when are they applied? only when those Terrorist are a threat to the House of Saud.
As to your Imam of the Grand Mosque of Saudiland, yes, He speaks from one side of the Mouth of Islam, all the while the other Imams of Saudiland, speak out of the overside of the mouth of Islam.
Yes Lies of Commission, Omission, and just plain Deceit, that is the Mouth of Islam.
Hudna, Kitman, and Taqqiya.
I think this is one of the things about Islam that bothers most, if not all, westerners ...the ideal that all Muslims are one giant collective with a single voice .... "Our desire is....." See? You're speaking for every single Muslim on the freakin' planet!
Muslims the world over seem to defend the actions of other Muslims almost without thinking about what happened or why. In that regard, it seems that Muslims want to be accepted as this giant collective speaking in a single voice.
Yet when it comes to some situation like Iraq or Afghanistan wars, where Muslims are killing other Muslims, they change their approach and claim that some Muslims are NOT part of that giant collective.
Seems to me that Muslims are or are not part of that giant collective that speaks in a single voice.
So .....what the is "Muslims"? Are you a giant collective? Speaking in a single voice or not?
Baron Max
Those who do not hold to our ideals, our traditions of benevolence, justice, and equality, they are not part our civilization. They are merely criminals, and it is an error of the Western judgment to define us by them. ....
We are a great civilization, the like of which there exists no parable in human history, we are a proud and exalted nation.
This would be hard for someone outside of our civilization to comprehend, ......
Well, it's all just words, right? And I would suggest that criminals like Osama bin Laden and others like him also use those same/similar words of Islam's greatness, etc when they're blowing up things and people ......in the name of Islam.
So .....who do we believe? You ...who speaks of benevolence, peace and good-will toward all men? Or the likes of Osama ...who speaks of the unity of Muslims, and calls for the death and destruction of all non-Muslims?
Just words, but we have to believe something! It's sure as hell easy to believe people like Osama and the like .....since they make a helluva lot of noise about it, not to mention death and destruction.
Islam is not a "great civilization"! Islam is a religion. You speak of great civilization, yet the areas of the world that are predominantly Muslim are some of the most destitute areas of the world. How can you call that poverty and hunger and disease as ....a great civilization? Without western medicines and such, most of those places would be worse than they are!
I think that you speaking of Muslims as a united collective, with united goals and aspirations, is actually doing more harm than good. How can you speak of Islamic unity when Muslims are killing Muslims all over the world?
Baron Max
I don't base my views of the common establishments of the Muslim religion on the bad actions of the US government, or vice versa. I am not choosing between approval of oppression and approval of the opppressed.diamond said:"My own somewhat jaundiced view of Islam, for example, dates back to the Salman Rushdie affair "
As opposed to jailing and deportation of hundreds of Muslim scholars and college professors in America.
Your honesty is not the problem I have with your views.diamond said:The problem that you, and Atheists, Zionists, and Republicans have with me is that I am honest about my views.
And they have it, in many places. You talk as if the Muslims of the earth were one body of people.diamond said:The Muslim world represents 25% of the human race. This large impoverished, and exploited segment of the world population cannot be kept in chains forever. Our desire is for political, religious, economical, and military independence for our people. Is this not a reasonable demand? Are Muslims not worthy of freedom and self-determination as others?
That kind of extraordinary reaction - that the worldwide response among Muslims to Rushdie's novels was some kind of reasonably expectable "backlash", therefore not a sign of something wrong - is what I remember about the general response of most Muslims to the Rushdie matter. You, an obviously educated and literate person, appear to be clueless in this matter. And the only reason I can think of for that is your Islamic upbringing.arsalan said:The Salman Rushdie affair was a bit overblown in my opinion with the continuous coverage and repeating footage of books being burned by a handful of people. For years he had written books wherein he presented the wives of the Prophet as whores in a brothel. He wrote many other things about Muslims and various countries that would have angered them. To compare, it would have been like an Arab making fun of 9/11 or what Zhang Ya did and then not expecting a backlash
Specific examples of what? Same level as what? The argument keeps shifting. There are no Muslim countries on the "same level" as the upper tier of those commonly described as Western, for example, and no Islamic centers of research and education on the "same level" as the upper few dozens of Western institutions, and this situation has held for the past couple of hundred years - beginning with the scientific and industrial revolutions, neither of which (regardless of their roots) took hold in any primarily Islamic country.arsalan said:Actually those specific examples were for fedr808 who seemed to want specific examples. Looking at the larger picture, most Muslim countries are relatively on the same level.
I'll leave you to it - noting only, in possing, that I doubt any church in the US has ever rung with shouts of "death to the Arabs and Palestinians".And see, more proof of the way of thinking that annoys and frustrates people like me. As if I am best mates with Bin Laden or the like. Maybe you should tell Americans to drop the "Death to the Arabs and Palestinians" shouts and speeches in their churches,
noting only, in possing, that I doubt any church in the US has ever rung with shouts of "death to the Arabs and Palestinians".
"My own somewhat jaundiced view of Islam, for example, dates back to the Salman Rushdie affair "
You don't actually agree with that load of bs?:bugeye:
If you guys don't want that kind of publicity than reconsider the whole idea of death to America, destruction of Israel, plane hijackings and all of that other shit you guys do.
Well, it's all just words, right? And I would suggest that criminals like Osama bin Laden and others like him also use those same/similar words of Islam's greatness, etc when they're blowing up things and people ......in the name of Islam.
So .....who do we believe? You ...who speaks of benevolence, peace and good-will toward all men? Or the likes of Osama ...who speaks of the unity of Muslims, and calls for the death and destruction of all non-Muslims?
Just words, but we have to believe something! It's sure as hell easy to believe people like Osama and the like .....since they make a helluva lot of noise about it, not to mention death and destruction.
Islam is not a "great civilization"! Islam is a religion. You speak of great civilization, yet the areas of the world that are predominantly Muslim are some of the most destitute areas of the world. How can you call that poverty and hunger and disease as ....a great civilization? Without western medicines and such, most of those places would be worse than they are!
I think that you speaking of Muslims as a united collective, with united goals and aspirations, is actually doing more harm than good. How can you speak of Islamic unity when Muslims are killing Muslims all over the world?
a meaningless fatwa by some Ayatollah
That kind of extraordinary reaction - that the worldwide response among Muslims to Rushdie's novels was some kind of reasonably expectable "backlash", therefore not a sign of something wrong - is what I remember about the general response of most Muslims to the Rushdie matter. You, an obviously educated and literate person, appear to be clueless in this matter. And the only reason I can think of for that is your Islamic upbringing.
My only purpose in picking up "robot" from the discussion was to draw attention to the nature of the "conditioning" involved, which you seemed to be overlooking in claiming, for example, that the Pillars were not conditioning while traffic rules were. Instead, it distracted. So it's jettisoned, for my part. The question - is it the {external regulations} that make the {conditioned one} a {conditioned one}? - is still worth attention, IMHO.
Specific examples of what? Same level as what? The argument keeps shifting. There are no Muslim countries on the "same level" as the upper tier of those commonly described as Western, for example, and no Islamic centers of research and education on the "same level" as the upper few dozens of Western institutions, and this situation has held for the past couple of hundred years - beginning with the scientific and industrial revolutions, neither of which (regardless of their roots) took hold in any primarily Islamic country.
Now this is quite possibly coincidence, a matter of the kinds of factors Jared Diamond demonstrates to correct us if we are unfortunately assuming an unearned superiority of culture or race. And as you are busy with another argument altogether
I'll leave you to it - noting only, in possing, that I doubt any church in the US has ever rung with shouts of "death to the Arabs and Palestinians".