Islam vs. the Western World: off-topic posts from a Religion thread

..... What more do you need?

You're right, SAM .....we need the violence in Anbar to continue ...especially with Muslims killing Muslims. That's what you like, isn't it, SAM? That's what you defend all over the world, ain't it, SAM?

Baron Max
 
Clearly, stability in the Middle East is not in the US interest.

Name one country there where they do not support extremists or militants.
 
Clearly, stability in the Middle East is not in the US interest.

Name one country there where they do not support extremists or militants.

Don't want to talk about Muslims killing Muslims, SAM? Trying to deflect the issue so you don't have to directly defend the Muslim tactics of fighting "invaders"?

Supporting extremists? Oh, SAM, we just love watching those Muslims kill all the other Muslims! You do, too!! Why shouldn't we give them weapons and ammo?

Baron Max
 
Clearly Americans never kill Americans. Hence the second amendment.

Yes, we do, SAM, but no one comes on the sciforums and applauds such killings ......like you do with Muslims killing other Muslims. Nor do we defend the Americans killing Americans ....like you defend Muslims who kill other Muslims.

Strange, huh?

Baron Max
 
It's not clear to me. Please explain.

Its a war for resources. Stable governments develop notions of independence and cannot be counted on to deliver the goods as a buyers market. Note that protecting US interests is the primary consideration of these wars.
 
So what evidence do you have of this assertion?

This is verbal dodgeball.
 
Wave a few bucks at an Afghani Muslim, and he'll go out and kill Afghani Muslims by the truckload. What a way to fight a war, huh?

Wave a few bucks at American bankers, and they go out and pay themselves huge bonuses! What a way to run an economy, huh?
 
You know, it's amusing to watch Sam scrape and whine about imaginary bigotry, while defending "Haircut" DH (an actual bigot) and lumping all Americans together, which I don't do.

How odd. Or not.

Walk a mile in DH`s shoes, and THEN, perhaps, you may comment about bigotry.
 
You have to watch the Baron, StrawDog, he engages in hyperbolic rhetoric to set you off on tangents.
 
Ahh, you're an ass kissing apologist. If a Muslim detonated themselves near your wife and kids, you'd probably blame the West for that.

Although on occasion, ass licking could be considered pleasant, I am not an apologist as much as I am an advocate for honesty.

I don`t condone violent extremism. I don`t condone violence against innocents. I advocate understanding of the underlying causes of the violence and taking honest and concrete steps to end the cycle.
 
I don`t condone violent extremism. I don`t condone violence against innocents. ...


And yet you've been consistently defending the violence of Muslims against Muslims in Afghanistan. You've been cheering their "resistance" even as those same Muslim terrorists blow up more innocent Muslim women and children in Afghani marketplaces. And you say you don't condone violence???

Baron Max
 
And yet you've been consistently defending the violence of Muslims against Muslims in Afghanistan. You've been cheering their "resistance" even as those same Muslim terrorists blow up more innocent Muslim women and children in Afghani marketplaces. And you say you don't condone violence???

Baron Max

Calm down Forrest. All I have been defending is injustice. You are magnifying the actual level of Muslim on Muslim violence, and you know it.

The presence of foreign troops is a major catalyst in the violence.
 
Back
Top