sure
Most people, including the prosecution, would view that as criminal indoctrination, however.
Is Religious Indoctrination Criminal?
- Thread starter PsychoticEpisode
- Start date
Most people, including the prosecution, would view that as criminal indoctrination, however.
this thread reminds me of a facebook post i grimaced at. some fellow high school grad was so pleased that his 12 year old daughter was baptized in his swimming pool last summer that he threw a party around it. and i thought, "good job at blindly indoctrinating your own daughter into something she understands nothing about, against her will, cause she wants to please her daddy, and probably jading her against christ for life, you asshole." fucking religious people.
You are a religious person.
Yes, you are, you belong to the cult of Christianity.
I’ve given your proposal some thought. My conclusion is the freedoms we enjoy must be protected. The freedom to believe, have faith and or worship is a worthy attribute with respect to our democratic way of life. People using their faith to break the laws established through our constitution must be held accountable. God is not above the law.
I think if God did exist he would agree, "yes the law goes double for me".
what would be an example of people using their faith to break the laws established by the constitution, a law that you deem god must also abide by in order to be "god"?
I don't think your beliefs are acceptable for everyone, however, in answer to your question without naming every violation of established law, stealing property from another person or business or the stealing of a birth right will do as an example. Not every person having faith is going to break the commandment not to steal. The sick delusion mind does reason stealing in the name of God is okay. Murdering in the name of God is another one.
Hi-jacking is stealing. Stealing the human birthright is just as bad. Killing another human in the name of a God will not go unpunished.
Last edited:
so when you talk of law abiding to god, you actually mean law abiding to those who claim to represent him?
Last edited:
Lori belongs to the Christian cult as she constantly regurgitates Christian doctrine and wants to sleep with Jesus.
Oh well done, Lori. Did you stay up all night to think of that witty and snappy comeback? :bravo:
The excuses for law breaking is God told me to do it or it is God's will I violate the laws he gave. Does it make sense for God to say don't steal or kill and then tell someone to do that very thing?
If God breaks the laws he established then he is a sinner too. Its like the kettle calling the pot black.
there is however the detail of what constitutes a primary value and what is a detail.
Even in terms of mundane society, we see that killing, while frowned upon, has its practical application in war (not to say that makes it above board, but rather that it has recourse to being necessary in certain circumstances). However if one takes the case of torture, etc, we see that extreme unnecessary abrasive behaviour is not tolerated (or ta the very least, has the capacity to make an administration very red faced at a later date)
not really since god has a potency that makes most of the morality that applies to us obsolete. For instance murder for us is a sin because we don't have the capacity to invest its existence, but for god, who places a particular living entity in a particular womb and redirects them to another environment after the demise of the corporeal body, death is simply relocation. Similarly, since god is the effective proprietor of everything, theft is not applicable to him. etc etc
All nonsense and without any wisdom. People that follow religious teaching have no evidence to back their so called insight. The religious wait for science to produce the evidence for them. Science can't and never has produce anything worth while concerning religious beliefs. Wisdom is in the hands of science these days.
p.s. Jesus said it best, those who have, more shall be given and those who have not even what they think they have shall be taken away from them.
Last edited:
I think for the sake of a coherent argument, you have to make up your mind whether you want to focus on the truth of a claim (what is the evidence) or the logic of a claim (how does it make sense)
If you want to accept "that's all nonsense" (bereft of an explanation why it is so) as a sufficient means to discredit a claim of logic, I can just turn around and say the same to you.
:shrug:
a person can use god as an excuse to commit a crime..that doesn't mean god told him to.....
I can apply the same thinking whenever any person claims God is guiding him or her in any way shape or form.