SetiAlpha6:
I note that you have not responded to a number of difficult points and questions that I put to you. Here are the links. I hope you're not avoiding the hard questions, changing the topic to the Turin Shroud and other irrelevancies.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/ar...having-an-abortion.161580/page-5#post-3563994
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/ar...having-an-abortion.161580/page-5#post-3564000
Any chance that...
The resurrection of Jesus gives hope to those who have no hope?
Sure, belief in the resurrection of Jesus can give some people a sense of hope.
The Shroud of Turin is pretty good evidence for the resurrection, and so is pretty good evidence for hope.
There's a lot of controversy over the authenticity of the Shroud, as I'm sure you're aware. I agree with you that it is good evidence for hope - like the hope of some Christians that it will turn out to be authentic after all.
spidergoat already asked you several times why you think the Shroud is evidence of the resurrection, but you avoided answering. Why is that?
There is rational, scientific evidence, for the resurrection of Jesus embedded in the Shroud.
Like what?
But it requires careful study and critical examination. It is one of the most scientifically scrutinized artifacts of all time, and it has survived all of it.
Actually, access to it for study is highly restricted. As an icon of the Catholic church (not, by the way, a relic, which means that the church has not yet officially said it is authentic), obviously its custodians are keen to preserve it.
The image on the cloth, is a negative, but is not a photographic negative. It has 3d information imbedded in the image itself. It is also not a painted image either.
The claims of 3D information are based on somewhat dubious analyses. The image is consistent with being painted.
Correct, the dating of the cloth was a problem for a while but has been explained, according to the main scientist involved with that aspect of it.
The dating that has been done has given various results.
---
I'm interested, though. You say you're a Christian by "evidence first and faith second". In terms of evidence, do you rely primarily on the Turin Shroud, or is other evidence more/as important to you?
Also, if you have evidence, why do you need faith?
By the way, there's a thread titled "Evidence of God" or something like that, in the Religion forum, where you might like to post your evidence. So far, the theists have had a pretty poor showing in that thread, with many of them being unable to come up with any evidence at all.