The spirit is not a concept; it is an entity!
And all the epistemology I tried to tell you is as distant to you as the moon ...
The spirit is not a concept; it is an entity!
And all the epistemology I tried to tell you is as distant to you as the moon ...The spirit is not a concept; it is an entity!
are you saying the spirit is not an entity?
No, but that many theists have very little epistemological awareness of their own stances.
And all the epistemology I tried to tell you is as distant to you as the moon ...
No, but that many theists have very little epistemological awareness of their own stances.
how so?The two seem to be much intertwined.
Core decisions probably involved putting pen to paper and somehow getting the manuscript to a publisherIf a person sees little reason to believe they can succeed, then their desire to do it will be low as well.
"Behaving in a godly manner" seems to me to be such a complex issue that it is beyond the application of free will.
Perhaps there are people who are so well trained in both godliness as well as ungodliness that they can decide, in a simple analytical manner, to behave either godly or ungodly, but I am not one of them.
If we take someone whom we perceive to be poetic and inquire of them how they have come to be poetic, the person may give us a list of numerous activities which they have performed over a course of time. Whereby no single instance of none of those activities is sufficient to become poetic; it might even have nothing directly to do with being poetic at all.
Doesn't matter.We might do something with the intention to become poetic, but there is no guarantee that our efforts will lead to that.
(Some schools of creative writing are notorious for producing authors who write utterly boring and pompous stuff...)
So sockless people with cold feet never experience (via free will) the desire to have a pair?Sure. But one probably won't make that decision to begin with unless one is first sure that one has socks to wear.
Is it possible for people to freely "behave in a Godly manner"?
Is it possible that people "behave in a Godly manner" only when they don't have free will?
Provide reasoning and/or evidence (scriptural or other) for or against.
how so?
does desire = success?
Or can desire exist quite distinctly from success?
So sockless people with cold feet never experience (via free will) the desire to have a pair?
This is so patronizing.
The cause of my stance is experience (interaction with the entity itself), not language.
So you concede that desire can exist independently from anticipated success levels?Like I said:
"If a person sees little reason to believe they can succeed, then their desire to do it will be low as well."
Can you desire something that you don't think is possible?
If you don't have any socks, see no way to acquire socks, and have cold feet - how strong will your desire to get socks be?
Really? You don't think in language - not before the experience of the interaction with the entity itself, and not afterwards?
You are not using words now, right?
This is all direct, non-verbal experience, but which is nonetheless analytically correct and can be adequately enough verbalized.
Welcome to parapyschology!
I guess fideism is a branch of parapsychology ...
Can you desire something that you don't think is possible?
i really don't know what your point is anymore signal. a spirit is an entity with real attributes and characteristics that can be observed regardless of what language you might use, if any, to describe them. the most primitive of people have had spiritual experiences (which i'm sure you have cited in other threads while talking out of the other side of your mouth), and have described those spirits and experiences in a variety of languages, including pictures, clicks, and grunts i'm sure. so again, what is your point?
what is important about the spirit is not YOUR ideology about it and how you express that ideology through thought or language. what is important about the spirit is what IT accomplishes.
you may as well argue, what if we didn't have feet? or eyes? or fingers? or ears? or brains? we're human yes, and so we have developed the use of language. that development does not change what the spirit is. the spirit is still the same entity.
YES!
I desire a button for my shower, I push it and it turns on the water to a predetermined temp (which i can adjust)..
So you concede that desire can exist independently from anticipated success levels?"If a person sees little reason to believe they can succeed, then their desire to do it will be low as well."
If it was really that simple surmounting desire would be as easy as making the subject difficult or impossible to attainCan you desire something that you don't think is possible?
If you don't have any socks, see no way to acquire socks, and have cold feet - how strong will your desire to get socks be?
Do you really think such a button is not possible?
One of my points is that you are either unable or unwilling to place yourself in other people's shoes (in this case the shoes of atheists, non-Christians etc.), but nonetheless see yourself fit to judge them and expect them to take your judgment seriously.
Secondly, truisms prove nothing. Just because something seem to logically follow, it doesn't mean that it is true, or that we believe it.
"The spirit" may be the same entity regardless of what happens to us or what circumstances we are in; but how we relate to the spirit probably depends on what happens to us or what circumstances we are in.