Is it a sin to seek knowledge?

Status
Not open for further replies.
wellwisher said:
God being male is symbolic. This is based on ancient analogies, that are still useful today, since they are easy to derive from basic observations. The female; mother/matter, is the one who grows babies and gives birth through biological and material means. The female element was connected to material, matter, nature; tangible.

Although the female does 99.9% of the work, making a baby, this does not happen unless the male first fertilizes the egg. The male principle was connected to the conception or the quickening of the matter; activation. God, as male, is like the CEO, who comes up with the plan; fertilizes by his approval, with the female element; nature and matter, making it real and tangible. There is a team involved. In Catholic tradition, Mary sits with Jesus as a team. God fertilized Mary who made God real as Jesus. Jesus then becomes the spirit, that leads Mary; loop of life.

If you look at history, most invention and changing of the times is done by men. This is not to say women don't invent or influence the times. Rather the majority of the invention comes from males. The male makes different type of children; brain children, that begin in the mind. The female males material children, while the male makes brain children, with women often fertilizing the male mind, with need and want; behind every great man.

Invention starts in the human mind, within an imaginary matrix that is not exactly material in nature. The imaginary matrix does not have to follow the laws of cause and effect or statistics; walk to the moon. It is connected to consciousness and is information based, instead of material based. Ideas can exist alone, but they need to be worked on, in physical reality, before they can be make part of reality. The male principle is spirit and information. The male God is not material, but is more like spirit, intelligence and information; omniscience. To be made manifest, it needs material; matter. God becoming man needed matter, and not just consciousness.

If someone comes up with an idea, in these science forums, few will accept it without tangible proof. The idea is stuck, for good or bad, in a different state; just information, until it becomes part of matter; tangible proof. The masculine God is in a different place and will exist apart from material. An idea can be real even before it is proven. Many feel it needs to combine with the female aspect, matter and lab, before they can accept it as real. This thinking is more connected to a matriarchal god.

Patriarchal religions work under the premise, they don't need a material connection for proof, since all ideas that eventually real, due to material proof, already existed in reality, before they contacted matter, or else they would never have been able to come to fruition in matter.

Matriarchal religions are more about the need for a material presence. Its definition of reality and will need something more tangible; female element. Science is often matriarchal. To science, even a scientific miscarriage, where a partial development in the lab goes sour, would be considered bette, than just the idea in potential; pure idea. This is too masculine and more of less limited to physics and math.

A patriarchal religion is about abstract thinking, apart from the needs of ever having to be tangible. One can brain storm, narrowing options, not using up precious physical resources, while still making forward progress. The matriarchal is more resource intensive and like statistical studies, is more about matter leading thinking. Science is both masculine and feminine with the feminine principle leading the philosophy; tangible.
Click to expand...

God being male is stupid.

< >
 
akoreamerican said:
i do not hope, i know it is inevitable that the humans as species will see it self as god, though that's not entirely correct. The God is and always is. god the father is its proxy.
Click to expand...

This is not new. It is old. See Divine Council.

Man has claimed to be God forever.

And rightly so. Who but a man can give voice to the will of God?

There is and always has been only humans. As it should be.

The only God fit to rule men is a man. Or woman of course.

Regards
DL
 
akoreamerican said:
i do not hope, i know it is inevitable that the humans as species will see it self as god, though that's not entirely correct. The God is and always is. god the father is its proxy.
Click to expand...
I think we are destined to become gods. After all they are our role models.

Also your god apparently has multiple personality disorder.
 
StrangerInAStrangeLa said:
God being male is stupid.

< >
Click to expand...

Indeed. That is why most of the ancient Gods were androgynous.

Regards
DL
akoreamerican said:
god the father did not kill and torture but god the father knew that The God would react that way. because he believed himself to be The God, god the father just figured there was a good reason for why it happened, though he did not do it himself
Click to expand...

If you are going to take the line you are taking and do not want to look the fool then call the overlord God Good the way Gnostic Christians do.

You are following that myth so there is no pint in you looking the fool by using idiotic terms that only confuse.

My question was to the morality and not the who done it.

Speak to that so that we can at least know what kind of morals your idiotic presentation of myths are giving you.

Regards
DL
 
it is simple, lets say you know of a person who had the button on the bomb that destroys earth. at the moment the only way you can stop him is to kill him. you want to find a better way but there is none. so you kill the person to save the world
was it wrong to kill that person?
 
akoreamerican said:
all sent by The God, god the father took the blame and told us to be nice, and you think hes the bad guy?
Click to expand...
If he's not nice, why should I be? If he's not omnipotent, why should I worship him?

Do you mind telling me where your idea of the gods comes from? What religion are you?
 
spidergoat said:
If he's not nice, why should I be? If he's not omnipotent, why should I worship him?

Do you mind telling me where your idea of the gods comes from? What religion are you?
Click to expand...
he is nice, hes just strict, but hes softening up in recent years, see how the gay and lesbians communities are doing now a days. and he is omnipotent when he feels like it.

i consider myself christian but i have been told i am not... oh well
 
Greatest I am said:
This is not new. It is old. See Divine Council.

Man has claimed to be God forever.

And rightly so. Who but a man can give voice to the will of God?

There is and always has been only humans. As it should be.

The only God fit to rule men is a man. Or woman of course.

Regards
DL
Click to expand...
mankind believes it is God but it is not, though it is capable of miraculous feats our combined consciousness can warp reality
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top