ConsequentAtheist
Registered Senior Member
No, I will treat the racist with contempt, which is precisely what I have done in this case. Please moralize to someone else.
Is God Real?
- Thread starter Glow-in-dark-jesus
- Start date
R
Redoubtable
Guest
You're free to do that, CA, but your contempt for a racist does not imply that he or she can only put forth canards and falsities.
ConsequentAtheist
Registered Senior Member
I did not say that a particular statement was wrong because it was issued by pro-Nazi scum; I said that I had (and have) no desire to dialogue with them. I neither offered nor intended ad honimem. You distort my position, whether intentionally or simply due to ignorance is unknown. In your case, I don't particularly care.Originally posted by Redoubtable
CA: That's not true, because you're a fascist/racist blow-hard.
Redoubtable: Huh?
ConsequentAtheist
Registered Senior Member
And I implied that where?
R
Redoubtable
Guest
Well . . . ok
No, not that particular statement . . . that little dialogue thingummy was merely a colorful illustration.
This indicates that you do not think "racists" can "issue truth".
No, not that particular statement . . . that little dialogue thingummy was merely a colorful illustration.
This indicates that you do not think "racists" can "issue truth".
R
Redoubtable
Guest
Right here, amigo . . .
ConsequentAtheist
Registered Senior Member
Re: Well . . . ok
You are a fool. That is not what the sentence says. That is not what the sentence means.
Crushing Belial
Registered Senior Member
Hitler built Germany's industrial complex but that didn't change who he was a homocidal maniac, what could you learn from someone like that.
R
Redoubtable
Guest
To be sure, the sentence was a response to this question.
In the response you clearly stated "When you find racists issuing 'truth' . . ."
Now, if that's not doubt, what is?
In the response you clearly stated "When you find racists issuing 'truth' . . ."
Now, if that's not doubt, what is?
A
and2000x
Guest
CA is correct in that he never stated my comment was wrong. He simply does not want to associate with me.
However, his idea that I am a racist is reactionary and has no truth to it. My interest in National Socialist politics does not indicate that I am a Nazi or a fascist (although I do hold fascist tendencies). When one wishes to preserve their own heritage and the heritage of other races, they are ultimately accused of hatred. It is interesting how violently one feels they should defend their dogmatic positions, much like a fascist would.
So the Volkswagen Beetle and stealth bomber are of no use to anyone?
However, his idea that I am a racist is reactionary and has no truth to it. My interest in National Socialist politics does not indicate that I am a Nazi or a fascist (although I do hold fascist tendencies). When one wishes to preserve their own heritage and the heritage of other races, they are ultimately accused of hatred. It is interesting how violently one feels they should defend their dogmatic positions, much like a fascist would.
So the Volkswagen Beetle and stealth bomber are of no use to anyone?
Crushing Belial
Registered Senior Member
They are obsolete.
R
Redoubtable
Guest
Naw, he only called you a fascist . . .
The stealth bomber . . . obsolete? How about the interstate? Is that antiquated too?
Crushing Belial
Registered Senior Member
Yes, the government and the industrial complex are quaking in their boots over zero point energy free energy obtained on a subatomic level.
A
and2000x
Guest
Of course we don't need gasoline or electricity to travel, we can all use solar sails.
Crushing Belial
Registered Senior Member
Hey Cris check out www.seas.com interesting
Crushing Belial
Registered Senior Member
Oh nothing, it went back to what Redoubtable and i were talking about.
A
and2000x
Guest
As usual, CA runs away and doesn't even listen to my reasoning. What a bigot.
I more ignored the attempted point.
I doubt you ignored my point; you just missed it altogether. Well I got that attempted point. However, I differ in my opinion there. Science describes that which is observed. It does nothing else. Where people think there is anything else to it, they are kidding themselves, or do not know the nature of what they study/advocate. Science describes matter in terms of particles. You don't think those particles have to exist do you? Observations fit the hypothesis/theory/model. If observations contradict the hypothesis/theory/model, they are revised. Science is, simply, another form of language. Now consider all the languages we have here on earth. Science doesn't discover reality... it invents it relative to the human perspective. Science is what you call one HUUUGE approximation. Hope that helped. Your reality is what you make of it Cris... rationally. I keep telling you.... get a 'reality' check.
In your reality dear comrade.
Sure you don't.
It's my Christian duty to care. Of course, I would say, I can't force you to share my beliefs - not that I don't care - I'm pretty honest with myself. Now, in my view, that's your problem.
Well obviously you see your point here. That's good. It didn't appear to make a difference in our lives whether quarks or electrons or neutrinos existed Cris. Gathering they didn't exist, would you exist? Good point Cris.
Always my good fellow.