I don’t’ know if you have any children, but mine were taught not only by me, but also their health science courses in school, to verify the credibility of their information sources.
Capracus
well, it's not relevant, but i have a few children and grandchildren, and i do teach them to verify the credibility of their sources.... but the point is not that the site is full of crap, but that ... in the words of
pjdude1219 (because it is succinct and well said):
so in other words you don't give 2 shits if there lying as long as it serves your purposes
and yes, the site does make the claim, but (as noted) some of those "abortion tools" that are listed are NOT specifically designed for abortion, as you quote here:
The most gruesome medical tools ever made were designed for abortion.
a lot of the "gruesome medical tools" are simply medical tools with multiple purposes and functions that are used for things like: lumbar punctures, OB/GYN regular checkups, vaccinations, holding sponges to absorb blood (or suction for the same purpose) to be able to see for surgical accuracy, etc...
claiming that they are "gruesome medical tools designed for abortion" is an outright lie, misrepresenting modern (and historical) surgical tools
Visiting children would also have the opportunity to see a video example of a relatively modern mid term abortion procedure,
what kind of idiot would expose a CHILD to that kind of data without factual scientific data to represent what is actually happening?
even i wouldn't do that, and our family has a lot of medical folk in it... plus, there is always technical data to know... and if we did show anything of the sort, it is
by request and we
don't go for shock, but
fact.
key point there...
FACTS, not pseudoscience or religious fearmongering BS.
i would allow them to view a surgery, but i wouldn't try to scare the horse-puckey out of them.
the simply fact that you condone it speaks volumes about you, but even ignoring that point: when you misrepresent data for the sake of a religious or other belief, it is called pseudoscience (among other things), and it is specifically no better than trying to shove your beliefs down another persons throat and force them to accept your brand of stupidity... and as long as it is a belief without evidence, or you misrepresent it and intentionally support or condone the lie (like above) then it is NOT discourse, information, sharing, logical, or anything other than forceful fanaticism (perhaps you should actually read the study i linked?)
So it appears that the Grantham website hasn’t misrepresented its content at all.
are you illiterate?
so long as you quote the following
The largest abortion tool collection in the world. From modern tools to the 16th century.
The most gruesome medical tools ever made were designed for abortion
and then you post pictures of
MODERN SURGICAL TOOLS used on common surgery, labeled as "
gruesome medical tools...designed for abortion", then it is misrepresentation. (aka- a
LIE)
I don't expect you to get that... especially considering your historical posts, but (unfortunately for you) it is true
Other than some short side statements condemning abortion, there’s not much in the way of anti abortion propaganda. They basically present the images and let the viewers decide for themselves.
except, of course, they label modern surgical tools as specifically designed abortion tools... (which is misrepresentation, aka-
LYING) - see above for more details
...but what are actual facts when you have your own personal delusion to believe in, right?
I think it would be a good lesson for teens.
Bowser
i don't. if you are utilising fear, emotion as well as misrepresentation as a teaching tool and tactic, then the only thing that can possibly come from it is either:
1- you will drive away any logical thinking rational person (and lose your own credibility)
or
2- you will simply create a fanatical delusional person willing to take extreme lengths that are not rational or logical (or well thought out... you know, like bombing a hospital because a doctor might perform abortions works there?)
You would be hard pressed to find such in our day and age. Maybe in an underdeveloped country without proper medical services--if you're really wanting to make your point.
not really... if you want to show the point from one perspective, then why not address all perspectives? it is a valid point and requires honest answers. if you want to use fear and controlling emotional video's to force people to "think about abortions" then why not show the potential suffering that can come from not getting one as well?
so when you state:
We studied STD's when I was in school, why not the whole picture?
why not also promote and watch video's of the torturous ways it can also kill? (pictures don't do the pain justice... so lets get some syphilitic patients dying and allow them to not have treatment, etc... after all, it is the same as refusing a woman the right to abortion, isn't it?)
Condoms are already distributed in schools, yet teens still get pregnant and have abortions.
a lot of the reasoning behind that may also be because of the stigma and problems promoted by fanatical religious folk who are too misguided and hypocritical pushing a belief that is not constructive and not based upon sound principles... don't you think?