Is this a technical question? When you kill a living organism, isn't it murder?
Every living organism is a murderer on some level, even those who eat only plants. If you eat meat, isn't that a murdered animal? When you just go outside and walk, you'll be murdering anything under your feet. When you call the orkin man to rid of pests, isn't that murder? When you go to war, isn't that murder?
The reason why abortion can be justified is pregnancy doesn't occur independently, outside of the woman's body nor independent of her genes ( minus exceptions).
Sometimes murder is necessary. A woman who rejects the pregnancy would be apt to not take care of herself and not care for the offspring. That would be worse for the offspring.
And no, saving everyone to give up for adoption is unrealistic. You see there is an overabundance of people and unwanted or orphan children as it is.
How can any society using empty shortsighted platitudes justify the force of birth when it cannot even assure its livelihood anyway? Ridiculous.
Perhaps more societal pawns and slaves? or burdens on society? Society hasnt even got it together for those that are already here and its worried about more unwanted? Insane? Who cares what happens or its quality of life after its born, right? Not nearly as important?
It amounts to feigned caring ignorance or dismissive of real-life, long-term consequences if born.